Back
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
J. Pumachandra Rao, S/o Koteswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies Department – Respondent
ORDER :
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:-
2. The petitioner herein was temporarily
The acceptance of a regularization condition precludes the claim for retrospective appointment.
The petitioners cannot claim regularization of their services from the date of initial appointment and were entitled to count only half of their service rendered in consolidated pay posts for pension....
Regularization of services of provisional employees should revert to the date of their initial appointment, as established by legal precedents.
Temporary employees who have completed five years of continuous service are entitled to regularization of their service with effect from the date of completion of five years of service.
Irregular or illegal appointments cannot be regularised, and the benefit of regularisation already granted by the government is a concession that cannot be extended further.
Point of law : Petitioner herein did not put in 10 years of service under the respondent herein at any point of time. While that being so, the impugned order, placing reliance on G.O.Ms.No.22 and G.O....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
