Back
K. MANMADHA RAO
Shriram General Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Manchala Rama Lakshumamma W/o Thirupathaiah – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
1. The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (for brevity “the Act”) aggrieved by the order dated 11.05.2017 passed in W.C.No. 20 of 2013 by the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Kadapa (for short “the Commissioner”).
2. The Appellant herein is the Respondent No. 2/ Opposite Party No. 2 and the respondents No. 1 to 4 herein are the applicants/claimants and the respondent No. 5 herein is the Opposite Party No. 1 in W.C No. 20 of 2013. For sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to, as they are arrayed before the Commissioner.
3. The applicants have filed the impugned W.C.No. 20 of 2013 before the Commissioner claiming compensation of Rs.6,00,000/-.
4. Brief facts of the case are that the Opposite Party No. 1 is the registered owner of the auto bearing No. AP04 TU-1735 and the deceased Manchala Thirupathaiah was working as Auto driver under the Opposite Party No. 1 for the last two years prior to the accident and attending the said auto and that he was paid Rs.4,000/- per month besides batta of Rs.200/- per day. On the instructions of OP No. 1, on 21.12.2012 evening, while the d
The main legal point established is the determination of liability under the Workmen’s Compensation Act based on the employment relationship and compliance with policy terms by the insurance company.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the insurer is not liable to pay compensation for the death of a cleaner in an accident unless an extra premium is paid under the contract of ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of 'arising out of and in the course of employment' under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and the emphasis on a liberal....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of proving the employer-employee relationship and the occurrence of the accident during the course of employment, along with the ....
there is no liability on the opposite party No.3 when the opposite party No.1 employer categorically deposed that the deceased was not employed by him at any time and that the death did not take plac....
The court emphasized the requirement of a valid driving license, the existence of an employer-employee relationship, and the determination of the deceased's income for compensation purposes under the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
