Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
Ramakrishnaiah @ Ramakrishna, S/o. Late Chenrayappa – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This Criminal appeal is directed against the judgment, dated 05.01.2009 in S.C.No.185 of 2008 on the file of the Court of District and Session Judge, Chittoor (for short, "the learned Sessions Judge"), where under the learned Sessions Judge found the appellant-accused guilty of the offence under Section 304 Part-II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, "the IPC") as against the original charge under Section 302 of the IPC, convicted him under Section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, "the Cr.P.C.") and after questioning about the quantum of sentence sentenced him to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for ten (10) years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for three (3) months and that remand period shall be set of against the sentence under Section 428 of Cr.P.C.
2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the learned Sessions Judge, for the sake of convenience.
3. (i) The S.C.No.185 of 2008 arose out of committal order in P.R.C.No.19 of 2008 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of I Class at Kuppam, pertaining to Crime No. 69 of 2007 of S.H.O., Rallabudugu for the offence
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on dying declarations and witness testimonies to establish the guilt of the accused under Section 304 Part-II of the IPC.
Merely because, some superficial burn injuries were present on the fingers of the accused, it does not lead to any irresistible conclusion that he made efforts to put off the flames.
Consistent dying declarations by the victim and corroborative witness testimonies are sufficient for conviction under IPC Sections 498A and 302, despite minor discrepancies.
Insufficient evidence of cruelty under IPC Section 498-A to sustain conviction, leading to acquittal of the accused.
Point of law : In the absence of the same, a doubt arises as to whether really P.W.1 is speaking the truth in the Court. It is not a case where P.W.1 was declared hostile having regard to his version....
A dying declaration recorded by a competent authority holds significant weight in establishing the circumstances of a crime, while the absence of evidence supporting the specific elements of cruelty ....
The court ruled that inconsistencies in dying declarations and inadequate evidence undermine a murder conviction, emphasizing the need for reliable corroboration.
The presumption of innocence is reinforced by an acquittal, and the prosecution must provide compelling evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, especially in cases involving conflicting dyin....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
