Back
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
L. Adiseshu Babu, S/o Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra pradesh by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Velagapudi – Respondent
ORDER :
The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
2. The case of the petitioner is that he was engaged as Laboratory Record Assistant on temporary basis by the Management of Respondent No.3 on consolidated pay w.e.f 23.04.1985. The bone of contention of the petitioner is that the Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Ms.No.212 (Finance & Planning) Department, dated 22.04.1994 and formed a policy that for regularisation and absorption of employees who were appointed as daily wage/NMRs/ temporary in
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement to regularisation under G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994, and the applicability of this provision to the petitioner's case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of employees to regularization and absorption in sanctioned posts after working for more than ten years without the benefit or prot....
Regular appointments should be made through open competitive processes against sanctioned vacant posts, and part-time temporary employees are not entitled to seek regularization or parity in pay with....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's long service as a Trained Graduate Teacher against a substantive vacant post and the Government's decision to declare the non....
Temporary or casual employment does not confer legal rights to regularization; adherence to proper recruitment processes is mandatory for permanent appointments.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
