Back
A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
State – Appellant
Versus
Mude Krishnaiah S/o Subbaiah – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Challenge in this Criminal Appeal is to the judgment, dated 03.04.2007, in Calender Case No.33 of 2002, on the file of the Court of Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Nellore (for short, ‘the learned Special Judge’), where under the learned Special Judge found the Accused Officer not guilty of the charges under Sections 7 and 13(2) R/w.13(1)(d) of the Prevention of the Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the PC Act’) and acquitted him under Section 248(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C’).
2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the trial Court, for the sake of convenience.
3. The State, represented by Inspector of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Prakasam District, Ongole filed charge sheet against the Accused Officer in Crime No.16/ACB-NPK/2001 alleging the offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) R/w. 13(1)(d) of the PC Act. The case of the prosecution, in brief, according to the charge sheet averments, is as follows:
(i) Sri Vaddella Ramanaiah (AO) worked as Assistant Lineman, Madanur Village, Kothapatnam Mandal, Prakasam District during the period from 03.11.1995 to 26.06.2001 and he is a ‘Publ
The judgment emphasizes the importance of establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the need for consistent and reliable evidence in corruption cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, the need for corroborative evidence for witness test....
The prosecution must prove the pendency of the official favor as alleged in corruption cases to secure a conviction.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to prove the official favor pending with the accused and the demand for bribe beyond reasonable doubt.
The prosecution must prove the demands and acceptance of a bribe to establish guilt under the P.C. Act.
The judgment established the importance of proving demand and acceptance of illegal gratification by a public servant to establish guilt under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) R/w.13(2) of the PC Act. It also....
The judgment establishes the importance of proving foundational facts and providing substantial evidence to support allegations in a corruption case.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for foundational facts to prove demand and acceptance of bribe, and the benefit of presumption under Sec. 20 of the P.C. Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
