IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A.V. RAVINDRA BABU, J.
Kondru Israel, S/o. Maridayya - Petitioner
Versus
The State of A.P., Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1509 of 2010
Decided On : 01-02-2024
Dowry Death - Criminal Appeal - Section 304-B of IPC - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 304-B of IPC, Section 235(2) of Cr.P.C., Section 235(1) of Cr.P.C., Section 113-B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - The court found the appellant guilty of the charge under Section 304-B of IPC and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years. The judgment is sustainable under law and facts.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the death of a woman within seven years of her marriage, allegedly due to cruelty or harassment by her husband for a demand for dowry. The prosecution presented evidence of harassment and physical assault by the husband, leading to the death of the woman. The defense claimed that the woman committed suicide due to chronic stomach pain.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the appellant guilty of the charge under Section 304-B of IPC and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years. The judgment is sustainable under law and facts.
Issues: The key issues were whether the death of the woman was within seven years of marriage and whether she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband for a demand for dowry soon before her death.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the prosecution proved the essential ingredients of Section 304-B of IPC and further strengthened its case with the statutory presumption under Section 113-B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The evidence on record categorically proved that the deceased was subjected to physical and mental torture by the appellant in connection with a demand for dowry, leading to a dowry death.
Final Decision: The Criminal Appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence imposed against the appellant were confirmed. The appellant was directed to surrender before the Court and comply with the sentence imposed.
JUDGMENT :
Challenge in this Criminal Appeal is by the unsuccessful A.1 to the judgment, dated 09.11.2010 in Sessions Case No.340 of 2009, on the file of III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kakinada (“Additional Sessions Judge” for short), where under the learned Additional Sessions Judge found the present appellant/A.1 guilty of the charge under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (“IPC” for short), convicted him under Section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“Cr.P.C.” for short) and after questioning him about the quantum of sentence, sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years. By the said judgment, the learned Additional Sessions Judge found A.2 and A.3 not guilty of the charge under Section 304-B of IPC and further found A.4 and A.5 not guilty of the charge under Section 304-B r/w 34 of IPC and acquitted them under Section 235(1) of Cr.P.C. As against the acquittal of A.2 to A.5 as above, there is no appeal filed by the State.
2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the learned Additional Sessions Judge for the sake of convenience.
3. The Sessions Case No.340 of 2009 arose out of a committal order in P.R.C.No.21 of 2009, on the file of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Peddapuram, relating to Crime No.61 of 2009 of Rangampeta Police Station.
4. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Peddapuram, filed a charge sheet in Crime No.61 of 2009 of Rangampeta Police Station alleging the offence under Section 304-B r/w 34 of IPC.
5. The case of the prosecution, in brief, according to the charge sheet filed by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Peddapuram, is as follows :
(ii) L.W.1 performed the marriage of deceased with A.1 on 14.06.2009 at the house of Accused at G. Donthamuru Village as per Hindu rites and caste custom in the presence of relatives and elders. At the time of marriage, she gave Rs.25,000/- towards dowry to A.1 out of agreed dowry of Rs.35,000/-, Rs.3,000/- towards adapadusu katnam to A.4 and A.5 and also gifted gold ring and gold chain to A.1. She presented a pair of gold ear studs, gold Sathamanam and a pair of silver anklets to the deceased. She sent the deceased to the house of accused to lead marital life. The deceased is blessed with a daughter by name Sirisha, now aged 2 years. All the accused started harassing the deceased by beating her for want of unpaid dowry of Rs.10,000/- and sent her to the house of L.W.1 thrice to bring the balance unpaid dowry of Rs.10,000/-. L.W.1 used to take the deceased to the house of accused by pacifying the accused and by assuring that she would give the balance of dowry within a few days. She left the deceased at the in-laws house. In April, 2009 A.3 took the deceased and her daughter to house of L.W.1 and left her by saying that she will be taken to her in-laws house whenever the unpaid dowry of Rs.10,000/- is paid to them. On 23.06.2009, L.W.3-Arasada Appala Konda and L.W.4-Kosuri Laxmi, who are the relatives of the deceased, took her to in-laws house as per the request of L.W.1 and informed to the accused that the due amount of Rs.10,000/- will be paid before 10.07.2009. On 01.07.2009 night A.1 and A.2 started harassment and beat the deceased on the plea that she did not prepare the fish curry properly which was witnessed by neighbourers. Harassment was continued in spite of the request made by L.W.1, L.W.3 and L.W.4. Accordingly, on 02.07.2009 at 1-00 p.m., the deceased committed suicide by hanging herself to a beam in the room of her in-laws for unbearable harassment made by the accused.
(iii) Basing
The judgment reaffirms the legal principle that the prosecution must prove the essential ingredients of dowry death under Section 304-B of IPC and can strengthen its case with the statutory presumpti....
The court established that the accused's demand for additional dowry and the resulting harassment led to the victim's death, satisfying the criteria for dowry death under IPC Section 304-B.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 304-B of IPC and Section 113-B of the Indian Evidence Act to establish the live link between dowry harassment and the co....
The prosecution established that the accused subjected the deceased to continuous harassment for dowry, leading to her suicide within seven years of marriage, warranting conviction under Section 304-....
The requirement of substantial evidence of dowry-related harassment is essential to sustain a conviction under Section 304-B of IPC, which the prosecution failed to demonstrate.
The burden lies on the prosecution to establish the ingredients of Sec. 304-B, and once proved, the presumption under Sec. 113-B comes into play. The accused can then attempt to displace the deemed c....
The prosecution categorically established the charges under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt.
The judgment established the application of statutory presumptions and the proximity test in proving dowry death, emphasizing the burden of proof on the accused for facts within their exclusive knowl....
The court mandated that for a conviction under Section 304-B IPC, the prosecution must demonstrate a proximate link between cruelty and the death, which was found lacking in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.