A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
Mamidi Mariadasu, S/o Nanaiah172 – Appellant
Versus
The State of AP Rep – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Challenge in this Criminal Appeal is to the judgment, dated 12.10.2009 in Sessions Case No.628 of 2008, on the file of I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Guntur (“Additional Sessions Judge” for short), whereunder the leaned Additional Sessions Judge, found the accused guilty of the charge under Sections 304-B as well as 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (“IPC” for short), convicted him under Section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“Cr.P.C.” for short) and after questioning him about the quantum of sentence, sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years for the charge under Section 304-B of IPC and further sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs.100/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days for the charge under Section 498-A of IPC and that both the sentences shall run concurrently.
2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the learned Additional Sessions Judge for the sake of convenience.
3. The Sessions Case No.628 of 2008 arose out of a committal order in PRC.No.77 of 2008, on the file of Additional Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri, pertaining to
The judgment established the application of statutory presumptions and the proximity test in proving dowry death, emphasizing the burden of proof on the accused for facts within their exclusive knowl....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 304-B of IPC and Section 113-B of the Indian Evidence Act to establish the live link between dowry harassment and the co....
The court established that the accused's demand for additional dowry and the resulting harassment led to the victim's death, satisfying the criteria for dowry death under IPC Section 304-B.
The burden lies on the prosecution to establish the ingredients of Sec. 304-B, and once proved, the presumption under Sec. 113-B comes into play. The accused can then attempt to displace the deemed c....
The prosecution categorically established the charges under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt.
The court ruled that to establish dowry death under Section 304B IPC, the prosecution must show cruelty for dowry was inflicted soon before the victim's death, with a clear link between the two.
Conviction upheld - Dowry death - there was persistent demand of dowry made by accused from the victim who was used to subjected to cruelty and harassment for such demand and ultimately she had ended....
The prosecution established that the accused subjected the deceased to continuous harassment for dowry, leading to her suicide within seven years of marriage, warranting conviction under Section 304-....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that to convict an accused under Section 304-B IPC, the prosecution must prove that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment in connecti....
The court mandated that for a conviction under Section 304-B IPC, the prosecution must demonstrate a proximate link between cruelty and the death, which was found lacking in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.