Back
ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
Nur Salim Mallick – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background information and charges against appellants. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. details and credibility of witness testimonies. (Para 7) |
| 3. appellant's arguments on prosecution evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. prosecution must prove causal link between alleged cruelty and death. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final ruling modifies sentence and clarifies legal outcomes. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. court's findings on dowry and harassment. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 7. final outcome and orders of the court. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.
1. The instant criminal appeal is preferred by the appellant against a judgment and order dated 16th June, 2000 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Midnapore in Sessions Trial Case No. XL/November 1997, convicting the appellants under Section 4 98A/34, 304B/34 of INDIAN PENAL CODE and under Section 4 read with Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and sentenced the appellants to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine of Rs.2,00,000/- each, in default, whereof further rigorous imprisonment for three months each under Section 4 98A of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and to suffer rigorous imprisonment for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
