Back
A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
APSRTC, rep by its Vice Chairman as Managing Director, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Gunnam Venkata Lakshmi Died as per LR, W/o Ananda Rao – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The present MACMA is directed by the appellant against the award, dated 16.08.2011 in M.V.O.P.No.934 of 2009, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-IV Additional District Judge (F.T.C.), Tanuku (“Tribunal” for short), where under the Tribunal as against the claim of the petitioner under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (“MV Act” for short) to award compensation of Rs.4,50,000/- with regard to the injuries received by her in a motor vehicle accident that was occurred on 05.09.2007, awarded a sum of Rs.1,80,000/- with proportionate costs with interest at 9% per annum from the date of order till the date of deposit.
2) The parties to this MACMA will hereinafter be referred to as described before the Tribunal for the sake of convenience.
3) The case of the petitioner in M.V.O.P.No.934 of 2009 according to the averments in the petition filed under Section 166 of MV Act r/w 455 of MV Rules is as follows:
The petitioner who is the injured is an employee at Dubai by the date of accident. She was hale and healthy and used to earn Rs.5000/- per month. Due to unfortunate accident, she suffered grievous injuries resulting in permanent disability. On 05.09.2007 the pe
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of liability and assessment of compensation in a motor vehicle accident case under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The court ruled that compensation awarded by the Tribunal was excessive and not supported by evidence, leading to a reduction in the awarded amount.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of compensation in a motor accident case based on the evidence of rash and negligent driving, injuries sustained, and medical exp....
The judgment reinforces the principle that compensation for motor vehicle accidents should reflect the severity of injuries and loss of income, ensuring fair redress for victims.
The court emphasized the necessity of applying the structured formula for compensation under Section 163(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act, leading to an enhanced award for the claimant.
Assessment of compensation for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident should consider the nature of injuries and loss of earnings suffered by the claimant.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement to enhanced compensation based on the nature of injuries and loss of earnings resulting from a car accident caused by the rash and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's authority to enhance the compensation awarded by the Tribunal based on the claimant's injuries, disabilities, and related expenses, as ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
