SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1120

SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Muvva Atchutha Rao – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Naga Praveen Vankayalapati, Advocate, Kochiri Raja Shekar, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. The above writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:

    "... to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 entertaining representation filed by the 6th respondent after long lapse of 23 years and thereby 4th respondent passing impugned orders dtd. 18/4/2016 in its proceedings in Rc.No.9680/2015-A which is confirmed by the 3rd respondent in Revision Petition in D.DIs.No.1675/2016- D5, dtd. 23/1/2018, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction, arbitrary violation of principles of natural justice, violative of provisions of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and rules framed there under and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300- A of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the orders passed by the 3rd respondent passed vide its an order its Revision Petition in D.Dis.No.1675/2016-D5, dtd. 23/1/2018 thereby confirmed the order passed by the 4th respondent dtd. 18/4/2016 in Rc.No.9680/2015-A and pass any other order or orders ..."

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that petitioner and respondent No.6 are son and father. Respondent No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top