JUDGMENT :

D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU, J.

This Court has heard Sri O.Manohar Reddy learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri Kirthi Teja Kondaveeti and learned Government Pleader for Labour for respondents.

2. Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned senior counsel for the appellant contends that the learned single Judge committed an error in interpreting sections 33(1)(b) and 33(2) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘the Act’). He points out that there is no unfair trade practice at all in this case and that before taking action, the petitioners had in fact sought approval from the Labour Court for taking action against the workman. Only after the approval was granted, the management had taken action. He also argues that the services of the workman were terminated on 13.07.2009 and a writ was filed thereafter, but the order of termination was not challenged.

3. He points out that labour Court after going through the relevant provisions of the law has granted permission on 01.07.2019 for taking action. He points out to the prayer in I.A.No.61 of 2008 and the findings given by the Labour Court. He relies on the questions framed by the Labour Court and the answers to the sa