Back
K. MANMADHA RAO
National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
P. Vinayaka Reddy S/o G. Chengal Reddy – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Questioning the Award dated 12.01.2017 passed by Motor Accidents claims Tribunal-cum-VIII Additional District Judge Chittoor in M.V.O.P. No. 58 of 2014, the appellant, who is shown as 2nd respondent in the M.V.O.P. filed the present M.A.C.M.A.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None appears for 1st respondent.
3. Brief facts of the case are that the 1st respondent herein filed M.V.O.P. No. 58 of 2014 before the lower Tribunal under Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act read with Rule 455 of A.P. Motor Vehicles Rules claiming compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- for the injuries received by him in the motor vehicle accident. The averments made in the claim petition are that on 13.08.2012, at about 9.45 a.m. near Punepalle on Chittoor-Penumur Road, while the 1st respondent along with one Mr. Balaji were proceeding towards Chittoor in their motor cycle and when their motor cycle reached Ramareddipalem of Punepalle and by that time the driver of dairy van bearing Registration No. AP 03 U 5862 drove the same in a high speed and dashed the 1st respondent motor cycle, as a result, the 1st respondent and Mr. Balaji fell down and sustained bleeding injuries. Later the 1st respondent shi
The main legal point established is the determination of liability for a motor vehicle accident and the assessment of compensation based on the evidence of injuries and disability.
The court established that a driver with a valid license for light motor vehicles is permitted to drive an auto-rickshaw, affirming liability for the accident.
The court confirmed the liability of the insurer for compensation in a motor vehicle accident, emphasizing the validity of the driver's license and the assessment of damages.
The judgment reaffirms the principles of establishing liability in motor accident compensation claims under the Motor Vehicles Act, based on evidence of rash and negligent driving, assessment of disa....
Disability to part of body cannot be treated as disability to whole body.
Disability to part of body cannot be treated as disability to whole body.
The court upheld the Tribunal's findings on negligence and compensation, affirming that the awarded amount was just and reasonable based on the evidence presented.
The main legal point established is the assessment of compensation in road traffic accident cases based on the claimant's injuries, loss of income, and future income, considering the nature of injuri....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
