SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 650

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.T.Narendra Prasad, J.
Nagarajappa - Appellant
Versus
Fathima B. - Respondent
MFA No. 754 of 2019(MV)
Decided On : 01-07-2022

Advocates appeared:
Saritha Kulkarni, Advocate, B.Pradeep, Advocate

The main legal point established is the assessment of compensation in road traffic accident cases based on the claimant's injuries, loss of income, and future income, considering the nature of injuries and treatment duration.

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation Claim - Sec. 173(1) - Road Traffic Accident - Rash and Negligent Driving - Compensation Assessment

Fact of the Case:

The claimant was injured in a road traffic accident due to rash and negligent driving of another vehicle. The claimant filed a petition seeking compensation under Sec. 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle. The court assessed the compensation based on the claimant's injuries, loss of income, and future income, and enhanced the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Issues: The issues included assessment of the claimant's income, nature of injuries, and adequacy of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the claimant's evidence, medical reports, and guidelines issued by the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority to assess the notional income and disability percentage. The court also considered the nature of injuries and treatment duration to determine the compensation.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed in part, and the claimant was awarded a total compensation of Rs.2,53,120.00 with interest at 6% per annum. The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation amount within six weeks.

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal under Sec. 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been filed by the claimant being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dtd. 24/11/2018 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Member, MACT-IV, Davangere in MVC No.313/2018.

2. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeal briefly stated are that on 27/12/2017, the claimant as a pillion rider was proceeding on the Hero Honda Passion Motor Cycle bearing Registration No.KA-17/V8251 from Davanagere to Chitradurga, the said vehicle was driven by the rider in a moderate speed on left side of NH4 road, when it reached near Anagodu NH4 road, at about 11.30 A.M., the driver of the Maruthi Alto Car bearing Registration No.KA01/MG-8678 drove the same in a rash and negligent manner endangering the human life with great speed and dashed against the motorcycle. As a result of the aforesaid accident, the claimant sustained grievous injuries and was hospitalized.

3. The claimant filed a petition under Sec. 166 of the Act seeking compensation. It was pleaded that he spent huge amount towards medical expenses, conveyance, etc. It was further pleaded that the accident occurred purely on account of the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle by its driver.

4. On service of notice, the respondent Nos.1 and 2 being the owner and the insurer of the offending vehicle have appeared through counsel and filed written statement in which the averments made in the petition were denied. The age, avocation and income of the claimant and the medical expenses are denied. It was further pleaded that the quantum of compensation claimed by the claimant is exorbitant. Hence, he sought for dismissal of the petition.

5. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the Claims Tribunal framed the issues and thereafter recorded the evidence. The claimant himself was examined as PW-2 and Dr. D. Maheshwarappa was examined as PW-3 and got exhibited documents namely Ex.P1 to Ex.P16. On behalf of the respondents, no witness was examined but got exhibited document namely Ex.R1. The Claims Tribunal, by the impugned judgment, inter alia, held that the accident took place on account of rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle by its driver, as a result of which, the claimant sustained injuries. The Tribunal further held that the claimant is entitled to a compensation of Rs.1, 65, 280.00 along with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. and directed the Insurance Company to deposit the compensation amount along with interest. Being aggrieved, this appeal has been filed.

6. The learned counsel for the claimant has raised the following contentions: Firstly, even though the claimant claims that he was doing mason work and earning Rs.15, 000.00 per month, but the Tribunal has taken the notional income as merely as Rs.9, 000.00 per month. Secondly, due to the accident, the claimant has sustained grievous injuries. He was treated as inpatient for a period of 13 days. Even after discharge from the hospital, he was not in a position to discharge his regular work. He has suffered lot of pain during treatment. Considering the same, the compensation granted by the Tribunal under the heads of 'loss of amenities', 'pain and sufferings' and other heads are on the lower side. Hence, she sought for allowing the appeal.

7. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the Insurance Company has raised following counter contentions:

    Firstly, even though the claimant claims that he was earning Rs.15, 000.00 per month, he has not produced any documents to establish his income. Therefore, the Tribunal has rightly assessed the income of the claimant notionally.

      Secondly, the injuries suffered by the claimant are minor in nature. Considering the injuries sustained by the claimant and considering the age and avocation of the claimant, the overall compensation awarded by the Trib

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon Back to top