Back
A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
B. Sof – Appellant
Versus
K. Nagamma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's challenge of prior judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. plaintiff's claim of specific performance. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. defendants' counterarguments against performance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. disclosure of ownership dispute over property. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. issues settled for trial. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. petition to receive additional evidence. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. examination of the trial court witnesses. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. conduct and arguments around readiness and willingness. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 9. evaluation of mutual obligations in contract. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 10. assessment of specific performance criteria. (Para 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 11. implications of third-party ownership claims. (Para 67 , 68 , 69) |
| 12. conclusion on specific performance entitlement. (Para 71 , 72) |
| 13. final order and the implications of the decision. (Para 91 , 92) |
JUDGMENT
1. The judgment, dtd. 16/3/2018, in Original Suit No.12 of 2010, on the file of the Court of II Additional District Judge, Kurnool at Adoni (for short, 'the learned Additional District Judge') is under challenge in this Appeal filed by the appellant.
2. The appellant in the capacity of the plaintiff filed the aforesaid Su
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
