SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1358

A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
Yanaki Gopala Krishna – Appellant
Versus
State: Prohibition And Excise Inspector – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
N.Harinath, Advocate, C.H.Ravindra Babu, Advocate, Bhogadi Mallikharjuna Devarayulu, Advocate

JUDGMENT

A.V.RAVINDRA BABU,J. - The judgment, dtd. 19/3/2010 in Sessions Case No.2 of 2010, on the file of I Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, is under challenge in the present appeal filed by the unsuccessful Accused No.1 and Accused No.2 ("A.1 and A.2" for short), who faced conviction and sentence under Sec. 8(c) r/w Sec. 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 ("NDPS Act" for short) for possessing 30 Kgs. of Ganja.

2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the trial Court for the sake of convenience.

3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, according to the averments set out in the charge sheet filed by the State, represented by Prohibition & Excise Inspector, Mangalagiri, in Crime No.89/2009-10 of Prohibition & Excise Station, Mangalagiri, under Sec. 8(c) r/w Sec. 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act, is that;

(a) A.1 is resident of Marellavari Street, 22nd Ward, Near Simhadri Appanna Temple, Bheemavaram, West Godavari District and A.2 is resident of Lingamgunta Village, Ananthasagaram Mandal, Nellore District.

(b) On 21/11/2009 L.W.3-G.E. Ananda Babu, Prohibition & Excise Head Constable, Mangalagiri; L.W.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top