Yanaki Gopala Krishna vs State: Prohibition And Excise Inspector

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(AP) 1358

A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
Yanaki Gopala Krishna – Appellant
Versus
State: Prohibition And Excise Inspector – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
N.Harinath, Advocate, C.H.Ravindra Babu, Advocate, Bhogadi Mallikharjuna Devarayulu, Advocate

Table of Content
1. challenge to earlier judgment in ndps act case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. procedural foundation laid for trial and conviction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's observations on evidence. (Para 8)
4. arguments regarding non-compliance of ndps act provisions. (Para 15 , 18 , 19 , 24)
5. argument for non-compliance of provisions. (Para 16 , 17)
6. details on specific statutory provisions. (Para 27 , 29)
7. conscious possession and its implications under ndps. (Para 30 , 53 , 57)
8. summary of findings and conclusions. (Para 56)
9. final disposition of the appeal and orders issued. (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62)

JUDGMENT

A.V.RAVINDRA BABU,J. - The judgment, dtd. 19/3/2010 in Sessions Case No.2 of 2010, on the file of I Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, is under challenge in the present appeal filed by the unsuccessful Accused No.1 and Accused No.2 ("A.1 and A.2" for short), who faced conviction and sentence under Sec. 8(c) r/w Sec. 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 ("NDPS Act" for short) for possessing 30 Kgs. of Ganja.

2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the trial Court for the sake of convenience.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(AP) 1358

A. V. RAVINDRA BABUYanaki Gopala Krishna – AppellantVersusState: Prohibition And Excise Inspector – Respondent

Cases Referred (11)

A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
Yanaki Gopala Krishna – Appellant
Versus
State: Prohibition And Excise Inspector – Respondent