IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Subba Reddy Satti, J.
Deevi Srinivasa Charyulu - Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 10133 of 2023
Decided On : 04-10-2023
Encroachment - Land Dispute - Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 30 of 1987, Sec. 83 - The court discussed the encroachment of land belonging to a temple and the eviction of encroachers under Sec. 83 of the Act. It highlighted the definition of 'encroacher' and emphasized that without valid lease, mortgage, or license, continued possession of the property would render the person an encroacher.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner and others occupied land belonging to a temple, and the temple sought eviction orders against them under Sec. 83 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 30 of 1987.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's possession of the land without valid lease, mortgage, or license rendered them encroachers under Sec. 83 of the Act, and upheld the eviction orders issued by the Tribunal.
Issues: 1) Whether the petitioner is termed as encroacher under Sec. 83 of the Act? If so, whether he is liable to be evicted? 2) Whether the order dtd. 26/7/2022 in O.A.No.170 of 2015 on the file of A.P. Endowments Tribunal, Amaravati is liable to be set aside?
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that without valid lease, mortgage, or license, continued possession of the property would render the person an encroacher under Sec. 83 of the Act.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was dismissed, and the eviction orders against the petitioner were upheld.
JUDGMENT
1. The above writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
"... to issue a Writ or Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to Decree and Order dtd. 26/7/2022 passed in OA No.170/2015 on the file of Hon'ble A.P. Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi, at Pedakakani and set aside the same as highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust and violative of Rule of Law, violative of Article 14, 19(1)(g) and 300-A of the Constitution of India and against the procedure contemplated under the A.P. Endowments Act, 1987, consequentially direct the respondents herein to sell the property to the petitioner as per acceptance @ Rs.240.00 and Rs.300.00 per square yard in the interest of justice ..."
2. a) In the affidavit it was contended, interalia, that the petitioner and 50 others occupied the land in Sy.No.233 of an extent of Ac.15.38 cents. Petitioner has been in possession of 228 square yards. Petitioner and others formed an association, which was registered under the Societies Act under the name and style of 'Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Housing Society' (for short "the Society") vide No.90 of 1986 dtd. 17/4/1986. Representation was made on behalf of society to the Government as well as to the Endowments Department. The Endowments Department at District Level including respondent No.2 made proposals to the higher authorities to sell the property in favour of petitioner and others, in possession of respective extents.
b) The Commissioner, Endowments addressed a letter dtd. 22/7/1999 to the Government requesting to accord permission to respondent No.3 Temple to sell the land in favour of 37 encroachers @ Rs.300.00 per square yard. Respondent No.3 in its letter dtd. 11/2/2004 addressed to the Endowments Department requested to regularize the encroachments Ac.1.72 cents in Sy.No.233. It is also proposed by the Government that the rate should be Rs.500.00 per square yard. When the negotiations between the encroachers and the Endowments Department were going on, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.405 Revenue (Endowment-II) Department dtd. 4/7/2002 for regularization of encroachments in respect of urban properties and policy guidelines for land disposal, based on the recommendations of the Cabinet Sub Committee.
c) Pursuant to G.O.Ms.No.405 dtd. 4/7/2002, the Society addressed a letter to the Government requesting to alienate the property to the encroachers for Rs.240.00 and Rs.300.00 per square yard. Some of the affected parties approached the High Court and filed W.P.No.21148 of 2002 and the High Court granted interim order at admission stage and the same is still pending consideration.
d) Respondents 2 and 3 filed O.A.No.170 of 2015 on the file of A.P. Endowments Tribunal, Amaravati, under Sec. 83 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 30 of 1987 (for short "the Act") seeking eviction of the petitioner and others. Petitioner contested the OA. The Tribunal vide order dtd. 26/7/2022, without considering the material available on record, ordered eviction and further directed the petitioner to pay Rs.3,000.00per month as damages. Aggrieved by the same, the above writ petition is filed.
3. Counter affidavit is filed by respondent No.3. It was contended, inter alia, that respondent No.3-Temple is the absolute owner of an extent of Ac.15-38 cents in Sy.No.233, Mangalagiri Town and Mandal, Guntur District, which was donated by Namburu Venkatappaiah and others for Akhandam (Akhanda Deepardadhana), Nitya Naivedyam etc. The petitioner herein is admitting title of the Temple over the schedule land. The petitioner's family occupied the land in an extent of 228 square yards in survey No.233 of Mangalagiri Town, Guntur District, belonging to Temple, as such petitioner has no subsisting right over the Temple land. Long possession of land belong to Endowments does not confer any right. Petitioner is encroacher under Sec. 83 of the Act.
Without valid lease, mortgage, or license, continued possession of the property would render the person an encroacher under Sec. 83 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions a....
Disputes regarding title over land belonging to charitable institutions must be addressed by the Endowments Tribunal, making writ petitions under Article 226 not maintainable.
The absence of a valid lease in the petitioner's name negates his claims to occupancy and challenges to eviction; eviction procedures under the Endowments Act must be strictly followed.
Ownership disputes regarding endowment property should be resolved by the Endowments Tribunal, not through writ proceedings under Article 226.
The High Court cannot entertain writ petitions related to land disputes already being adjudicated in specialized tribunals, directing parties to follow appropriate legal channels for resolution.
A person who continues to occupy the temple property even after the expiry of the lease period is an encroacher and liable to be evicted.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.