K. MANMADHA RAO
District Collector – Appellant
Versus
V Raghunathan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The present Second Appeal is preferred by the appellants aggrieved by the Decree and Judgment dtd. 9/9/2014 passed in A.S.No.1 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi, confirming the decree and judgment dtd. 5/8/2002 passed in O.S No.49 of 1991 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Puttur.
2. The appellants herein are the defendants and the respondent herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.49 of 1991 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Puttur (for short "the trial Court").
3. For convenience the parties are hereinafter referred to as arrayed before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi (for short "the first appellate Court") in A.S.No.1 of 2004.
4. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff filed O.S No.49 of 1991 before the trial Court for grant of declaration declaring that the amendment made to the original notification No.351, dtd. 3/8/1952 vide G.O.Ms.No.726 (Revenue) dtd. 10/8/1967 published in A.P. Gazette, dtd. 31/8/1967 as invalid and not binding upon the plaintiff and also for granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their sub-ordinates not to interfere with the plaintiff's peaceful possess
G. Amalorpavam vs. R.C. Diocese of Madurai
Girijanandini v. Bijendra Narain AIR 1967 SC 1124
Gurdev Kaur and others versus Kaki and others
High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, Vegesna Ratnamma v. Chinta Venkateswarlu
Kulavant Kaur v Gurdial Singh Mann
State of A.P. vs. Kothacheruvu Plantations and Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.