SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 486

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J.
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by District Collector, Chittoor
Versus
Kothacheruvu Plantations and Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Others
ASMP Nos. 152 of 2008, 2157 of 2010, 3172 of 2012 & A.S. No. 507 of 1995
Decided On: 17-04-2014

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:Y. Chandrasekhar Learned Special GP appearing for the Office of the Advocate General for the State of A.P.
For the Respondents:K.V. Nageswara Rao, E. Manohar Senior Counsel, A. Chandrayya Naidu, B. Neeraja Sudhakar Reddy, M.V.S. Suresh Kumar, A.Subba Reddy, K.S.Gopal Krishnan, P.Ganga Rami Reddy, Advocates.

Delivery of possession pending suit would be only subject to result in the suit/appeal.

Headnote:Specific Relief Act, 1963-Section 34-Declaratory suit---Delivery of possession pending suit would be only subject to result in the suit/appeal. Even alienations pending suit are subject to result of the suit under section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882---If plaintiff/appellant is held entitled to the reliefs of declaration claimed by it, then in exercise of power of this Court under Order 41 Rule 33 CPC, High Court is entitled to grant relief of delivery of possession also to the appellant, even if it was not prayed for in the suit since on the date of the suit it is in possession of the property and the defendants got into possession after the present suit was filed--- KCK is a pre settlement Inam included in the assets of Kalahasti Zamindari at the time of permanent settlement---Judgment and decree of the trial court cannot be sustained.

       Result-Appeal allowed.

       

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal is filed by the State of Andhra Pradesh challenging the judgment and decree dated 7.8.1994 in O.S.No.52 of 1985 of the Subordinate Judge, Srikalahasti in Chittoor District. The subject matter of this appeal is an extent of about 1500 acres of land known as Kothacheruvu Kandriga (Kandriga, is a beneficial grant by a Ruler of a large block of land which is less than a village but much larger than an ordinary inam (per Sounder Raja Ayyangar “Land Tenures in the Madras Presidency” p. 203).) (for brevity, ‘KCK’) near Gudimallam village in the district of Chittoor. It earlier formed part of the Zamindari of Srikalahasti. The said Zamindari formed part of the erstwhile Madras Presidency and was controlled by the Nawabs of Arcot.

THE GRANT OF KCK IN 1786 A.D AND IT’S GIFT TO DEITIES OF PERUMBUDUR TEMPLE IN 1863 A.D

2. In 1786 A.D., KCK was granted by the then Zamindar (The word ‘Zamindar’ literally means a land holder and in the eye of the government he was no more than an officer or collector of revenue without any lordship over, or proprietary right to, the lands under his charge. He was accountable to the government for the amount he collected and he was allowed to retain a portion of it (about 10%) and also to hold certain allotments of lands revenue free (per Sounder Raja Ayyangar p.107 to 108).) of Srikalahasti to Sri Ramanuja Kootam Koil Veeraraghavaswami and his brother Ayyappa as a personal grant without burden of payment of jodi or rendering of any service.

3. The grantees in turn gifted KCK to Adikesava Perumal and Bhashikarla Swami Devasthanam, Sriperumbudur under a registered gift deed dated 04-03-1863.

THE PERMANENT SETTLEMENT REGULATION XXV OF 1802

4. The Marquis of Cornwallis, the then Governor General of India initiated what came to be known as “permanent settlement”. The said term meant settlement in perpetuity of the government demand with the intermediate class of persons such as Zamindars. In 1799, positive orders were sent from England that Lord Cornwallis’ scheme was to be adopted throughout the Madras Presidency. Lord Wellesley, who succeeded him as Governor General directed the commencement of operations on the lands of the East Coast of India. Regulation XXV of 1802 was passed for carrying out the purposes of the permanent settlement. It conferred proprietary right in the soil on the Zamindars. (per Sounder Raja Ayyangar p.116 to 119) The effect of the permanent settlement was to convert the precarious tenure previously held by Zamindars into a permanent one to give them a right to hold their estates forever on a fixed peishkush payable to the British Government with heritability and transferability. By virtue of the grant by the Government in favour of the Zamindar under the permanent settlement, the latter got a prima facie title to all lands lying within the geographical limits of their Zamindaris. “Peishkush” is the assessment fixed at the time of the permanent settlement payable by the Zamindar to the government. On the fixing of such assessment, the Zamindar was granted a sanad-i-milkiyat-i-istimrar or deed of permanent property in which the conditions and articles of the tenure are entered, and he is required to execute a corresponding kabuliat. Any dispute regarding assessment is regulated by the Sanad and the kabuliat. (per Sounder Raja Ayyangar p.120 to 125). The assets or income of the Zamindari were taken into account for the purpose of arriving at the assessment payable to the Government i.e. peshkush. The policy of the East India Company at the time was to take away from Zamindars, the rights which according to modern western notions could only be exercised by the Sovereign power and to leave them only such rights as could be exercised by a private proprietor. Therefore on establishment of permanent settlement, it was made a fundamental condition that Zamindars should no longer be suffered to keep a military force and that preservation of general order and public tranqu



















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

gpt-4

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top