SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1440

SUBBA REDDY SATTI
C. Venkata Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
D.V.Sasidhar, Advocate, C.Sindhu Kumari, Advocate, V.Siva Prasad Reddy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The present writ petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

"...issue a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus of any other appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in sanctioning Rs.100.00 lakhs as per Item No.18 agenda dtd. 14/10/2021 for reconstruction of Sri Seetharama Swamy Vari Temple at Gundemadakala Village, Vinjamuru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District at the behest of the 5th respondent committee as bad, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21, 25 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent Trust not to release the amount of Rs.100.00 lakhs to the 5th respondent committee and direct the respondents not to demolish the temple and pass such other order or orders..."

2. Averments in affidavit, in brief, are that Sri Seetha Ramanjaneya Swamy Temple was constructed and developed by the grandfather of petitioner by name Late Sri Chimala Venkata Reddy. After the death of grandfather of petitioner, father of petitioner by name Narayana Reddy managed the affairs of the temple. Thereafter, p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top