SUBBA REDDY SATTI
C. Venkata Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The present writ petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
"...issue a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus of any other appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in sanctioning Rs.100.00 lakhs as per Item No.18 agenda dtd. 14/10/2021 for reconstruction of Sri Seetharama Swamy Vari Temple at Gundemadakala Village, Vinjamuru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District at the behest of the 5th respondent committee as bad, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21, 25 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent Trust not to release the amount of Rs.100.00 lakhs to the 5th respondent committee and direct the respondents not to demolish the temple and pass such other order or orders..."
2. Averments in affidavit, in brief, are that Sri Seetha Ramanjaneya Swamy Temple was constructed and developed by the grandfather of petitioner by name Late Sri Chimala Venkata Reddy. After the death of grandfather of petitioner, father of petitioner by name Narayana Reddy managed the affairs of the temple. Thereafter, p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.