SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1433

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Nidiganti Narasimhulu – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.Sundar Ganta, Advocate, N.Aswartha Narayana, Advocate, G.L.Nageswar Rao, Advocate

JUDGMENT

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J. - These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are directed under Sec. 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act against the Order dtd. 7/8/2009 in W.C.Nos.3, 5, 6, and 4 of 2005 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation & Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Anantapur.

Parties before the learned Commissioner:

2. The appellants herein were the Opposite Party No.2/Insurance Company and the respondents herein were the Applicants and the Owner of the Tipper respectively before the learned Commissioner.

Reference of parties in the appeal:

3. For the sake of convenience and understanding, the parties are referred to as they were arrayed before the learned Commissioner.

4. In order to explain the facts and determine the common issue involved in all these CMAs, this Court has taken C.M.A.No.265 of 2010 as these appeals are filed by the Insurance Company as against the same accident. The case of the Respondents Nos. 1 and 2/Applicants in CMA No.265 of 2010 in nutshell:

5. The applicants are the parents of the deceased Nidiganti Balanarasimhulu, S/o Nidiganti Narasimhulu, who died in the accident on 17/2/2004 at about 10.00 am. The deceased was working as a w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top