Back
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Divisional Manager, The United India Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bathala Kristaiah @ Pedda Kristaiah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. worker's entitlement to compensation for injuries sustained. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. insurance company's liability and policy terms. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. legal considerations for workmen's compensation claims. (Para 7 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. requirements for issuing notice to insurance parties. (Para 14 , 20 , 22) |
| 5. court's interpretation of insurance liabilities and precedents. (Para 15 , 17 , 19) |
| 6. admissibility of evidence in insurance liability cases. (Para 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J.
1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the impugned Order dated 26.11.2007 in W.C. No. 170 of 2005 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Kadapa (hereinafter be referred to as “Commissioner”).
2. The appellant was the O.P. No. 2/Insurance Company, the respondent No. 1 was the applicant and the respondent No. 2 was the O.P. No. 1/owner of the offending vehicle before the learned Commissioner. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they were arrayed before the learned Commissioner.
Case of Applicant in nutshell:
3. Applicant was working as a tractor coolie in Tractor and Trailer bearing Nos. AP04
The insurance company is liable for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act when an employee-employer relationship is established, regardless of the driver's licensing status or the nature ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the interest burden under Section 4-A(3)(a) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, shifts to the Insurance Company.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Insurance Company is primarily liable to pay compensation to the workmen under the Workmen Compensation Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the insurer is not liable to pay compensation for the death of a cleaner in an accident unless an extra premium is paid under the contract of ....
The insurance company is not liable for interest payments under the Workmen's Compensation Act; liability rests with the employer to pay compensation and associated interest.
The appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, and findings of fact by the Commissioner are final unless shown to be perverse.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
