SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1430

R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Sanaboina Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Cherukuri Raveswari – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The appellants are the defendants 6 to 9 in O.S.No.61 of 2012 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Palakol. The 1st respondent is the plaintiff.

2. The 1st respondent had filed O.S.No.61 of 2012, for mandatory injunction, for removal of the houses and other structures constructed by the appellants herein on the road margin and puntha in R.S.No.110/3 of Sangamcheruvu Village adjoining the R & B road passing through R.S.No.110/1 from Palakol to Myzarugunta. It is the case of the 1st respondent that she had agricultural land in R.S.No.112/2, 2-A and R.S.No.111/2C of Gorinthada Village which is hamlet of Sangamcheruvu Village. The 1st respondent contends that her access to the R & B road is being affected by the constructions made by defendants 6 to 9. It is the further contention of 1st respondent that she had approached the officials in the area, who are arrayed as defendants 1 to 5 in the suit, for removal of these encroachments. As the defendants 1 to 5 did not take any action, the 1st respondent moved the suit.

3. The appellants herein, who are defendants 6 to 9 filed their written statements and also participated in the trial by being examined as D.Ws. 4 to 8.

4.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top