SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1451

K. MANMADHA RAO
Plant Protection Products Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Konda Sekhar Reddy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.Rajasekhar, Advocate, P.Sridhar Reddy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The present Appeal is preferred by the appellant aggrieved by the order dtd. 23/10/2017 passed in I.A.No.1517 of 2011 in O.S No.173 of 2010 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Nellore (for short "the trial Court").

2. The impugned application has been filed by the appellant/defendant/petitioner before the trial Court under Order IX Rule 13 CPC seeking to set aside the ex parte decree passed against him on 26/11/2010 and permit him to contest the matter and for costs.

3. Originally the suit in O.S No.173 of 2010 was filed by the respondent/plaintiff for grant of specific performance of agreement of sale dtd. 11/12/1995 alleged to have been executed by the appellant/defendant and thereupon in the said suit the respondent/plaintiff obtained ex parte decree vide judgment and decree dtd. 26/11/2010 by the trial Court. It is stated that the appellant/defendant was not served with summons in the above suit or in the I.A or in the E.P and further he never resided in Flat No.S-A, 2 2nd floor, Sri Rajagopalapuram, Dagramitta, Nellore. The appellant/ defendant left Nellore long back and has been residing in Chennai. It is further stated that the appellant/defendant filed I.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top