Back
B. KRISHNA MOHAN
Larsen And Toubro And Vision Ventures Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. development agreement details. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. disputed land ownership and allotments. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. correspondence and arbitration issues. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. government orders and consequential actions. (Para 14 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. final judgment on contract status. (Para 20 , 23) |
| 6. court's observations and conclusions regarding the payment and contract status. (Para 21) |
| 7. final ruling and rationale for dismissal. (Para 24) |
JUDGMENT
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent and the learned Government Pleader for the 1st respondent.
2. This writ petition is filed questioning the G.O.Ms.No.4, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department dtd. 22/1/2021 issued by the 1st respondent permitting the 2nd respondent to cancel the land allotment in an extent of Ac. 31.30 cents (an extent of Ac.22.71 cents in Sy.No.7, 165/P & 166 and an extent of Ac. 8.59 cents in Sy.No. 67/P of Kommadi Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal & Visakhapatnam District) in Kommadi Village in favour of the petitioner-company and the consequential order in Rc.No.9464/2005/L&T/F1 dtd. 22/1/2021 passed by the 2nd respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
