SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1268

DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Peeram Amaranath – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.V.Satish, Advocate, M.Vidya Sagar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J. - Heard, Sri V.V. Satish, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Sri M. Vidya Sagar, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents 3 to 5.

2. The land admeasuring Ac. 1.12 cents in Sy. No. 246 of Kalamalla Village, Yerraguntla Mandal, Kadapa District belonging to the 1st appellant, was acquired by the Government and an award to that effect was also passed on 29/2/2012. This land was acquired for the purpose of establishing a thermal plant known as the Rayalaseema Thermal Power Plant, Stage IV (1 x 600 MW). Apart from the compensation under the award, the land losers, affected by the acquisition of their land for the above purposes, were also promised certain additional benefits including the application of G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (Project Wing) Department. G.O.Ms.No.98 provided for land losers, whose lands were acquired for Irrigation Projects, or their dependents to be granted employment to the extent of 50% vacancies of the categories equivalent to Junior Assistant/Typist and cadres below the said posts. This said G.O. also provided that reservation for various reserved categories would also be applicable.

3. In pursuance of aforesaid assu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top