SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1269

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Gottipati Venu Gopal – Appellant
Versus
Gaddam Vijay Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Venkata Rao Ravulapalli, Advocate, Eathakota Venkata Rao, Advocate

JUDGMENT

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J. - The instant petition has been filed under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, for quashing the Order dtd. 20/1/2020, passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class for trial of Prohibition and Excise offences, Nellore[Hereinafter, trial court"] in Crl. M.P. No.9 of 2020 in C.C.No.282 of 2016, whereby, the application moved by the petitioner/accused for sending the cheque in question to the expert, for determination of age of the ink, has been dismissed. Procedural History

2. The petitioner herein was the accused and the Respondent was the complainant before the trial Court.

3. The petitioner is facing trial in a private complaint, filed by the respondent herein for the offences punishable under Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881[Hereinafter, "N.I. Act"]. After submitting written arguments on behalf of both parties, petitioner moved an application for sending the cheque in question to an expert, for the purpose of determining the age of the writing in terms of the signature. The petitioner's stand for such a plea is that cheque and promissory note were procured by his brother-in-law relating to his con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top