SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 239

V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
M. Venkatesware Rao – Appellant
Versus
M. Siva Kesava Rao – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This Appeal, under Sec. 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure [for short 'the C.P.C.'], is filed by the Appellants/plaintiffs challenging the Decree and Judgment, dtd. 20/3/2003, in O.S.No.190 of 1996 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Eluru [for short 'the trial Court']. The Respondents herein are the defendants in the said Suit.

2. The Plaintiffs filed the above said suit for declaration that the will dtd. 18/1/1991 executed by late Motaparthi Seshayya is true and valid and for partition of the schedule properties into two equal shares and to allot one such share to the plaintiffs and for mesne profits and for costs of the suit.

3. Both the parties in the Appeal will be referred to as they are arrayed before the trial Court.

4. The brief averments of the plaint, in O.S. No.190 of 1996, are as under:

i) The father of the first plaintiff by name Seshayya executed a will on 18/1/1991. Under the said will, he bequeathed the property an extent of Ac.0.95 cents to the second plaintiff and Ac.0.15 cents in R.S.No.64/1 and Ac.0.23 cents in Rs. No.64/3 and 400 square yards of site to the first plaintiff and Ac.0.28 cents out of Ac.0.43 cents in R.S.No.64/1 to the f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top