Back
T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Kadiyala Purachandra Rao – Appellant
Versus
Ramalingeswara Swamy Temple – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
T. Mallikarjuna Rao, J.
1. This Second Appeal has been filed by the Appellant / Respondent / Defendant against the Decree and Judgment dated 31.07.2003, in A.S.No.6 of 1999 on the file of II Additional District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru (for short, ‘the 1st Appellate Court’) reversing the decree and Judgment dated 03.08.1998, in O.S.No.149 of 1993 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Eluru (for short, ‘the trial Court’).
2. The Respondent / Appellant is the Plaintiff, who filed the suit in O.S.No.149 of 1993 for recovery of Rs.8,838.48 ps, the value of 49 bags of paddy, together with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization towards the value of Martha due from the Defendant. The Appellant / Respondent is the Defendant in the said suit.
3. Referring to the parties as they are initially arrayed in the suit in O.S.No.149 of 1993 is expedient to mitigate any potential confusion and better comprehend the case.
4. The factual matrix, necessary and germane for adjudicating the contentious issues between the parties inter se, may be delineated as follows :
The court established that a landlord's claim for recovery of dues is maintainable independently of any pending remission applications.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the temple to maintain a suit for recovery of possession despite the issuance of a joint patta under the Tamil Nadu Minor Inam A....
Point of law: Considerations in terms of Section 100 CPC arise only when there is substantial question of law and not mere such questions of law or one based on facts. The learned counsel for the res....
The Appellate Court erred by dismissing the cross-appeal without independent consideration, contravening procedural fairness, and the temple's claim to property based on service grant was upheld.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Executive Officer has the right to file a suit for temple properties, and the Civil Court has jurisdiction to decide the title of the prop....
A deity, being a perpetual minor, holds title to its assets; a worshipper may institute a suit as a next friend to recover property when a trustee acts fraudulently or fails to protect the trust, all....
The Executive Officer of a temple cannot file suit without authorization from the temple's Board, highlighting the necessity for proper legal process in tenancy disputes. Additionally, tenants must r....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
