BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
Krishna Anjaneya Swamy Temple – Appellant
Versus
Nese Raman died – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The defendant No.1 in O.S.No.38 of 1997 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool is the appellant, the respondent Nos.9 to 13 are the legal representatives of the deceased-1st respondent, who was the plaintiff in the suit. (1st respondent-Nese Ramana). The respondent Nos.2 to 5 are the defendant Nos.2 to 5 and the defendant Nos.6 to 8 are the legal representatives of the deceased-2nd respondent.
2. The appellant and the respondent Nos.1, 9 to 13 herein after referred to as 1st defendant and plaintiffs as arrayed before the appellate Court and trial Court.
3. The plaintiff/1st respondent-Nese Ramana instituted the suit against the defendant Nos.1 to 5, seeking relief of declaration that they are alone got title, interest in the plaint schedule property, who is entitled to be in possession of the plaint schedule property, and for delivery of vacant possession of plaint schedule land to him, and for mesne profits, which suit decreed by the trial Court, directing the defendants to vacate the land, and delivery vacant possession to the plaintiff No.1/1st respondent, within one month from the date of Judgment, dated 06.06.2005 or 15 days after standing crop if any in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.