Back
K. MANMADHA RAO
Seetharama Kalayana Mandapam – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
2. Heard Mr. J.V. Phaniduth, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments for respondents 1 to 3; Ms. Padmavati Padnavis, learned Standing Counsel for the 4th respondent and Mr. D.V. Sasidhar, learned counsel for the 5th respondent.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that one Sri Gopaluni Purushothama Sharma Pakyaji purchased an extent of 583½ sq. yds at Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada through a registered sale deed dated 07.11.1940 with the funds of donors as a Trustee for construction of temp
The court affirmed that the Endowments Department's authority is not subject to review without explicit statutory provision, and prior judgments regarding property rights are binding.
The court established that the Commissioner of Endowments lacked jurisdiction to revoke exemptions and appoint trustees without following due process as mandated by the Endowments Act.
The court ruled that a petitioner lacks standing to contest administrative exemptions under the Endowments Act if they have no defined legal rights over the subject property.
Temple lands' unauthorized use by government without S.34 permission mandates compensation despite long delay, proven by ryotwari patta.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
