K. MANMADHA RAO
T. Venkataramana – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
2. Heard Mr. V.V. Satish, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader, Services-I for the 1st respondent.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that he was initially appointed as Village Revenue Assistant in the year 1995 and later promoted as Village Revenue Officer in the year 2012. While he was working as Village Revenue Officer, Gundlur-II Cluster, K
D. Vittal v. Registrar (Administration)
Shri Bhagwan Lal Arya v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi and Others
Whrilpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai and Others
Disciplinary actions must adhere to principles of proportionality and due process, ensuring fair treatment of employees in similar circumstances.
The limited scope of Judicial Review in interfering with the quantum of punishment imposed by the Competent Authority.
Disciplinary actions must align with established legal principles, particularly when underlying criminal proceedings are quashed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.