IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI, J.
Chilakala Sreenivasulu - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Criminal Petition No. 5932 of 2024
Decided on : 28-08-2024.
Quash - Criminal Petition - Section 138, 148 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Section 389 Cr.P.C. - The court interpreted Section 148 of the NI Act, emphasizing the appellate court's discretion to impose a deposit condition, while also recognizing exceptions based on specific circumstances.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash an order requiring a 20% deposit of compensation pending appeal against a conviction under Section 138 of the NI Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appellate court did not consider whether the case warranted an exception to the deposit requirement, thus failing to justify its order.
Issues: Whether the appellate court's order to deposit 20% of the compensation was justified and if it considered the possibility of an exception.
Ratio Decidendi: The appellate court must assess if a case is exceptional enough to waive the deposit requirement, and if so, must record specific reasons for this decision.
Result: The impugned order was set aside, and the application was restored for fresh consideration by the appellate court.
ORDER :
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/Accused, under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for quash of the order dated 26.07.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.211 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.50 of 2024 passed by the learned III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that learned Sessions Judge in the appeal against the conviction for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 passed the impugned order dated 26.07.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.211 of 2024 under Section 389(3) Cr.P.C., directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation amount ordered by the learned Trial Judge within a period of one (01) month from the date of the order, while suspending the sentence of imprisonment awarded by the learned Magistrate. He would submit that the order of the learned Sessions Judge is not in accordance with Jamboo Bhandari v. MP State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd’s case.
4. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor takes notice for the State and would submit that the Appellate Court has power to order the appellant to deposit such sum, which shall be a minimum of 20% of the fine or compensation amount awarded by the trial Court in an appeal against the conviction U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
5. Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is as under:
Power of Appellate Court to order payment pending appeal against conviction
1. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in an appeal by the drawer against conviction under section 138, the Appellate Court may order the appellant to deposit1 such sum which shall be a minimum of twenty percent of the fine or compensation awarded by the trial Court:
Provided that the amount payable under this sub-section shall be in addition to any interim compensation paid by the appellant under section 143A.
2. The amount referred to in sub-section (1) shall be deposited within sixty days from the date of the order, or within such further period not exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Court on sufficient cause being shown by the appellant.
3. The Appellate Court may direct the release of the amount deposited by the appellant to the complainant at any time during the pendency of the appeal:
Provided that if the appellant is acquitted, the Court shall direct the complainant to repay to the appellant the amount so released, with interest at the bank rate as published by the Reserve Bank of India, prevalent at the beginning of the relevant financial year, within sixty days from the date of the order, or within such further period not exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Court on sufficient cause being shown by the complainant.
6. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Surinder Singh Deswal @ Colonel S.S.Deswal and others, 2019 (11) SCC 341 on section 148 of Negotiable Instruments Act held as under:
Surinder Singh Deswal @ Colonel S.S.Deswal and others
Jamboo Bhandari Vs. M.P.State Industrial Development Corporation Limited and Others
The appellate court has discretion under Section 148 of the NI Act to impose a deposit condition, but must consider exceptions and provide reasons when waiving such conditions.
The Appellate Court must consider exceptional circumstances before imposing a deposit requirement under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The appellate court must evaluate if a case is exceptional to waive the mandatory 20% deposit under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Suspension of sentence – Direction to deposit 20% of compensation amount ordered by Trial Judge must be supported by reasons.
The Appellate Court must consider exceptional circumstances when imposing a deposit requirement under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, requiring specific reasons for its decision.
The appellate court has the discretion to waive the 20% deposit requirement under Section 148 of the NI Act if justified by exceptional circumstances.
Appellate courts must specify reasons when imposing deposit conditions under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, especially when considering exceptional circumstances for suspension of sen....
The Appellate Court must evaluate whether an exceptional case exists before imposing deposit conditions on suspension of sentence, recording reasons if an exception is applicable.
A speaking order is necessary for imposing the condition to deposit 20% of the compensation for suspending the sentence, as per the principle laid down by the Apex Court in Jamboo Bhandari v. M.P. St....
The court upheld the imposition of a 20% pre-deposit condition pending appeal under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing its necessity for expediting resolutions in cheque disho....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.