Back
K. MANMADHA RAO
Gaddala Jhonson Babu – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India, rep. by its Chief Manager – Respondent
ORDER :
(K. Manmadha Rao, J.) :
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
2. The facts of the case are that initially the petitioner joined in the service of the State Bank of Hyderabad and subsequently he was promoted in the same bank and finally he was working as Chief Associate of Cash In-charge of 4threspondent bank. Subsequently, the said State Bank of Hyderabad was merged with State Bank of India and now he was working in the respondent bank till the petitioner’s service was terminated. While he was working in the 4threspondent bank, on 5.12.2019, his branch manager info
The appellate authority must provide a reasoned decision when rejecting an appeal in disciplinary proceedings, ensuring adherence to natural justice.
The appellate authority must provide a reasoned decision and adhere to principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.
The court emphasized the limited scope of its interference in disciplinary proceedings and the importance of integrity in handling bank funds.
Dismissal from service without affording a personal hearing violates principles of natural justice, necessitating remand for reconsideration.
The court reaffirmed the principle that in disciplinary matters, particularly involving fraud, the domestic enquiry must follow natural justice and the resultant punishment must reflect the severity ....
Judicial review in disciplinary matters is limited; courts cannot interfere unless there are gross violations of procedure or principles of natural justice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
