IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI
K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
Pothuri Subba Raju, S/o Satyanarayana Raju – Appellant
Versus
The State of A.P. – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos.7248, 20068 and 20745 of 2020
Decided on : 30-08-2024
Cooperative - Suspension - Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act 1954, Section 59 - The court interpreted Section 59 regarding the authority to suspend employees and emphasized the necessity of following due process, leading to the conclusion that the suspension was illegal and arbitrary.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Chief Executive Officer of a cooperative society, was suspended without jurisdiction and due process under the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act and service rules, prompting him to seek reinstatement through writ petitions.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the suspension was issued without proper authority and due process, violating the principles of natural justice and the relevant provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act.
Issues: Whether the suspension of the petitioner was valid under the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act and whether the proper procedures were followed in initiating disciplinary action.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the suspension was illegal as it did not follow the required procedures outlined in the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act and service regulations, thus violating the petitioner's rights.
Result: The court set aside the suspension and ordered the petitioner to be reinstated with all consequential benefits.
ORDER :
WP No.7248 of 2020 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief:
WP No.20068 of 2020 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief:
WP No.20745 of 2020 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief:
2. As the issue involved in all these writ petitions is one and the same, they are being taken up for hearing as well as disposed of by way of this Common Order.
3. Since the facts in all the writ petitions are similar and identical, therefore WP No.7248 of 2020 is taken as lead case, and the facts therein hereinafter will be referred to for convenience.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that, initially, the he was appointed as a salesman, later, he was promoted as a clerk and subsequently, he was promoted as Chief Executive Officer in the No.B708, Sri Raja Gopala Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Limited, Kothalanka, Mummidiavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. Since the date of appointment, the petitioner was discharging his duties with utmost satisfaction of the superior authorities and he never committed any mistakes and dereliction of duties in his tenure and he is obeying the orders of superior every time. But, surprisingly, the petitioner was suspended on 04.09.2019 on certain allegations made under APCS Act Section 59 and service Rule chapter 4 by the 6th respondent without Jurisdiction and contrary to the proceedings of the 3rd respondent-District Cooperative Officer, Kakinada, dated 28.08.2019 and also stated in the suspension proceedings after two months the same may be reviewed by the committee to permit him to join the duties. However
Suspension of an employee under the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act must adhere to due process and jurisdictional authority, failing which it is deemed illegal.
Suspension of an employee under the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act must follow due process, including issuing a charge-sheet and conducting a proper inquiry.
The test laid down in Marappan's case continues to govern the maintainability of writ petitions against Co-operative Societies.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of Section 77 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 govern the removal and reinstatement of employees based on cri....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for compliance with the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Society Act, 1964, and the need for proper procedure and ev....
Writ petitions against private co-operative societies are not maintainable under Article 226 unless they demonstrate public authority status.
The Assistant Registrar of Cooperative Societies cannot restore a suspension already lifted by the Committee, as such authority is not vested under the Odisha Cooperative Societies Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.