IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K. SURESH REDDY, K. SREENIVASA REDDY, JJ.
Vodde Narayanappa, Anantapur Dst. - Appellant
Versus
The State of AP Rep PP – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.806 of 2016
Decided on : 31-07-2024
Murder - Conviction - IPC Section 302 - The court upheld the conviction based on consistent dying declarations, emphasizing their reliability and the absence of corroboration requirements when the declarations are trustworthy.
Fact of the Case:
The accused was convicted for murdering his wife by pouring kerosene on her and setting her ablaze after a quarrel, following a history of domestic violence and alcohol abuse.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the dying declarations made by the deceased were consistent and credible, establishing the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite the lack of corroborative evidence.
Issues: Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt based on the dying declarations of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi: Dying declarations can form the basis of conviction if found to be true and trustworthy, regardless of corroboration, provided they are not the result of tutoring or prompting.
Result: The Criminal Appeal is dismissed, confirming the conviction under Section 302 IPC.
JUDGMENT :
(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Sreenivasa Reddy)
Sole accused in Sessions Case No.23 of 2016 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Hindupur is the appellant herein.
2. Vide judgment dated 27.07.2016 in the aforesaid Sessions Case, the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, “IPC”) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of two years.
3. The substance of charge as against the accused is that the accused, being husband of one Sunanda (hereinafter referred to, as “the deceased”), having addicted to drinking alcohol and developed illicit intimacy with another lady, on 25.10.2013 at about 8.30 PM came to his house in intoxicated state, picked up quarrel with her, became wild, poured kerosene on her and set her ablaze, and subsequently she died while undergoing treatment and thereby he committed an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC.
4. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the accused, the deceased and the material prosecution witnesses are residents of Somandepalli village. P.W.1 is junior paternal uncle of the deceased. P.W.2 is mother of the deceased. P.W.3 is brother of the deceased. P.W.4 is wife of P.W.1. The deceased was living with her husband (the accused) along with her daughter at Somandepalli village. The accused was addicted to alcohol and developed illicit intimacy with a lady in the same village, resulting in domestic quarrels in their family. In connection with the same, elders intervened and chastised the accused, but the accused did not change his attitude. There were quarrels between the deceased and the accused, and inspite of several panchayats, the accused did not change his character. On 25.10.2013 at about 8.30 PM, the accused went to his house under intoxication and picked up a quarrel with the deceased. Suddenly, the accused became wild, poured kerosene on the deceased and set her ablaze. When the deceased raised cries, neighbourers rushed to the house of the deceased, and on seeing them, the accused ran away from the scene of offence. The neighbourers put off the flames, shifted the injured to an R.M.P. Doctor and provided first aid. Later, the deceased was shifted to Government Area Hospital, Hindupur. At about 10.20 PM on that day, on information, P.W.11, who was working as Head Constable in I Town police station, Hindupur, proceeded to Emergency Ward. At that time, Doctor was present there. P.W.11 examined the deceased and recorded Ex.P15- statement of the deceased. After recording the statement, he read over and explained the same to her and she admitted that whatever P.W.1 had written is true and correct. P.W.1 obtained signatures of the deceased and thereafter forwarded a copy of the same to the police station. P.W.20, the then Sub Inspector of Police, Hindupur Rural Police Station, received medical intimation from the District Government Hospital, Hindupur along with statement of the deceased, and based on the same, he registered a case in crime No.102 of 2013 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 307 IPC under Ex.P27-FIR. On 26.10.2013 at about 11.15 AM, P.W.20 proceeded to the Hospital, along with P.Ws.12 and 17, and recorded statement of the deceased and the same was videographed. Ex.P28 is the videograph. P.W.17 converted the videograph into C.D. and submitted to P.W.20. Thereafter, P.W.20 examined four witnesses in the hospital, observed the scene of offence under Ex.P30- mahazar and prepared Ex.P31-rough sketch of the scene of offence in the presence of P.W.18. P.W.20 examined the R.M.P. Doctor (P.W.7) and recorded his statement. He also examined P.W.8 and recorded his statement. Thereafter, he gave a requisition to P.W.14-Mandal Executive Magistrate to record statement of the deceased and P.W.14 recorded Ex.P20-statement of the deceased. On his requisition, P.W.13-Junior Civil Judge,
Dying declarations, if consistent and credible, can support a conviction without corroboration, as established by the court.
Reliance on dying declaration requires corroboration; mere circumstantial evidence is insufficient for conviction without proof beyond reasonable doubt.
The court clarified the legal position regarding the admissibility of dying declarations and the interpretation of Explanation II to Section 299 IPC in cases of culpable homicide.
Dying declarations can serve as the sole basis for conviction if they are consistent and credible; however, inconsistencies and lack of corroborative evidence can lead to reasonable doubt and acquitt....
Dowry death – Conviction upheld - Prosecution succeeded in establishing the guilt of the appellant/accused beyond reasonable doubt and the trial court rightly convicted the appellant.
The admissibility and reliability of dying declarations, the influence of intoxication on criminal actions, and the requirement of evidence for specific charges.
A conviction based on circumstantial evidence must establish clear links and prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; the reliability of dying declarations is paramount.
The voluntary and truthful nature of dying declaration and the competency of a child witness to depose are crucial in establishing guilt and determining the appropriate criminal offense.
Dying declarations can serve as sole basis for conviction if deemed reliable, conscious, and voluntary.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.