K. SURESH REDDY, K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Adipi Daniel, Prakasam Dst. – Appellant
Versus
Racharla Galaiah Prakasam Dst. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Sreenivasa Reddy)
The de facto complainant in Sessions Case No.125 of 2012 on the file of the VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Prakasam at Markapur (hereinafter referred to, as ‘the Sessions Court’) is the appellant in the present Criminal Appeal. Accused Nos.1 to 3 were tried and they were found not guilty of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for brevity ‘IPC’) and they were acquitted of the aforesaid charge in terms of Section 232 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘CrPC’).
2. The substance of the charge as against the accused Nos.1 to 3 is that on 19.07.2011 at about 7.00 PM, near plantain garden of one Amudapu Pedda Venkata Reddy situated at the outskirts of Y.Kothapalli village of Yerragondapalem Mandal, accused No.1 hit one Adipi Pedda Galeiah (hereinafter referred to, as ‘the deceased’) with a stick and wrapped a turkey towel around the neck of the deceased and further pierced his right eye with a small stick; accused Nos.2 and 3 caught hold of the hands and legs of the deceased and threw him out of the compound wall, due to which, the deceased was suffocated to
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and hearsay evidence is insufficient for conviction.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and hearsay evidence is insufficient for conviction.
The court affirmed that corroborative eyewitness testimony and medical evidence are critical in establishing guilt in murder cases under IPC Section 302.
The court established that intent to kill, evidenced by eyewitness testimony and medical findings, is crucial for a conviction under Section 302 IPC.
Instigation alone does not establish guilt for murder if the accused did not directly participate in the act leading to death.
Instigation alone does not establish culpability for murder if the accused did not directly participate in the act of violence.
The judgment establishes that child witness testimony, if credible and corroborated, can be sufficient for conviction, alongside the admissibility of extra-judicial confessions.
The court established that credible child witness testimony, when corroborated, can support a conviction, alongside the admissibility of extra judicial confessions.
The court affirmed that consistent eyewitness testimony and corroborating evidence can establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases.
The court established that a single blow without intent to kill does not meet the threshold for murder under IPC Section 302, warranting a conviction for grievous hurt instead.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.