Back
V. SUJATHA
Madhuchandra, Proprietor, Chams Cartoons – Appellant
Versus
State of AP – Respondent
ORDER :
This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short “Cr.P.C.”) to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.145 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Puttur, Chittoor District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short “N.I.Act”) read with Section 200 Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “Cr.P.C.”).
2. Petitioner herein is the accused. Respondent No.2 is the complainant. Respondent No.2 filed a private complaint against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I.Act read with Section 200 of Cr.P.C. alleging that the 2nd respondent-complainant is working as General Manager of Kolar Paper Mills Limited, Parameswaramangalam Village, Puttur Mandal, Chittoor District and he maintains the affairs of the company.
3. The petitioner-accused is customer of the said factory and used to transact the business with the complainant company by taking Kraft paper for using for his business which is named as “Chams Cartons” situated at K.R.S.Road, Mogarahalli, Hosahalli Post, Srirangapatna Taluk, Mandya District, Karnataka
Vicarious liability under the N.I. Act requires the company to be a party; absence of the company invalidates proceedings against the individual.
Vicarious liability applies to partners in a firm under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, making them accountable for cheques issued by the firm, irrespective of individual management in....
Prosecution under Section 138 of the N.I. Act is not maintainable against signatories of a cheque unless the firm, as the drawer, is also arraigned as an accused.
The court quashed proceedings against a former director for cheque dishonor, ruling that allegations did not establish an offense post-resignation, emphasizing the need to prevent abuse of legal proc....
Directors can be held vicariously liable for offenses committed during their tenure, even if they resign before legal proceedings commence.
The necessity of specific averments to fasten vicarious liability on a director under Section 141 of the N.I. Act, and the inability to quash the prosecution based on lack of specific averments in th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for specific averments to establish vicarious liability of partners in a partnership firm under Section 138 of the NI Act and the n....
Liability under Section 141 of the NI Act requires being in charge and responsible for the company's affairs. The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of this legal provision.
The court reiterated that issues around cheque liability under Section 138 NI Act must be decided at trial, underscoring the necessity for allegations in complaints to be accepted as true at the quas....
The issuance of a cheque implies liability under the NI Act, and courts should not quash complaints based on disputed facts without trial.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
