IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Arun Patiyal – Appellant
Versus
Navneet Sharma – Respondent
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
1. The petitioner (accused before learned Trial Court) has filed the present petition for quashing of complaint No.52-3 of 2019 bearing registration No.39/2019 titled Navneet Sharma vs. Arun Kumar and the order dated 30.01.2019 summoning the accused. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience).
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant filed a complaint against the accused for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short ‘NI Act’). It was asserted that the complainant is the registered owner of a private passenger vehicle bearing registration No. HP-35C-3300. He sold it to the accused on 10.09.2020 for Rs.7,50,000/-. The accused issued a post-dated cheque of Rs.7,50,000/- in the discharge of his legal liability. The complainant presented the cheque before his Bank but it was dishonoured with an endorsement of ‘insufÏcient funds’. The complainant served a notice upon the accused but the accused failed to pay the amount despite the receipt of the notice; hence, a co
Ameer Shah versus the State of Kerala
Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Limited
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
State of Karnataka v. M. Devendrappa and another
Mahendra K.C. v. State of Karnataka
Supriya Jain v. State of Haryana
Iveco Magirus Brandschutztechnik GMBH v. Nirmal Kishore Bhartiya
M.M.T.C. Ltd. v. Medchl Chemicals and Pharma (P) Ltd.
Muljibhai Patel v. State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.