Back
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
N. Chandramouli – Appellant
Versus
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
ORDER :
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking Mandamus, for the following relief:
2. The facts of the case, in brief, are as follows:
a. The respondent-APSRTC issued a Notification dated 31.05.1999 to fill up the backlog vacancies from the eligible candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes (SC)/Scheduled Tribes (ST) for Nellore and Tirupati Regions. Pursuant to the said notification, petitioners, who are eligible to the post of Drivers, applied and the Departmental Selection Committee selected the candidates, vide Proceedings dated 28.06.1999.
The court established that arbitrary denial of service recognition violates the principles of fairness and justice under Article 226 of the Constitution.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that contract employees, who have worked for a significant period and possess the necessary qualifications, are entitled to seek regularization of ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioners were not entitled to regularization of their services as drivers in the Assam Tribal Development Authority, and the court dire....
Employees selected under the same process maintain seniority regardless of appointment delays, and delays not attributable to them cannot deprive them of benefits.
The selection process for reserved positions must adhere strictly to established cut-off marks for each category, and a candidate cannot claim entitlement based on comparative performance against can....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
