SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1423

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
Vijay Singh and others - Petitioners
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation - Respondent
CWP No.918 of 2025
Decided On : 30-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate.

Waiting panel candidates have a right to appointment when posts are unfilled due to inaction of the employer, reinforcing equal treatment under the law.

Headnote:(A) Constitutional Law - Article 14 - Claim for regularization of services - Petitioners were not appointed when they should have been, due to inaction of the respondent - Court found merit in claims for regularization. (Paras 10, 12)

(B) Service Law - Right of candidates in waiting panel - Candidates in waiting panel have a right to be considered for appointment when posts remain unfilled due to valid reasons, reaffirming the principle established in prior judgments. (Paras 4(iii), 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners applied for Conductors' positions, were placed on a waiting list, but were not appointed as others were. They contended that they should be regularized to match the timing of similarly situated candidates.

Findings of Court:
Respondent failed in duties as these candidates had legitimate expectations for appointments from the waiting panel.

Issues: The core issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to regularization from the same date as other similarly situated conductors.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the delay in petitioners’ appointment was not their fault but rather the inaction of the respondent Corporation; thus, they should be deemed to have been appointed simultaneously with others.

Result: The writ petition was allowed, and respondents were directed to regularize services of petitioners.

JUDGMENT :

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.

According to the petitioners, it was due to inaction on part of respondent-Corporation that they were not given appointment as Conductors (contract) from the waiting panel alongwith other incumbents at the relevant time. It was only after a writ petition preferred by them was allowed that the respondent- Corporation offered appointment to the petitioners. The petitioners now seek regularization from the date the other similarly situated incumbents were regularized. In essence, the petitioners have prayed for giving them deemed contractual appointment from the date given to the other similarly situated incumbents and consequent regularization of their service at par with these counterparts.

2. The Case

Following facts are not in dispute:-

2(i) On 28.12.2019, an advertisement was issued by the erstwhile H.P. Staff Selection Commission (HPSSC) inviting applications for filling up 568 posts of Conductors in the respondent- Transport Corporation with post code-762. The last date for submission of application form was 31.01.2020.

2(ii) Petitioners alongwith others applied for the post of Conductors and participated in the selection process. The selection process comprised of written test (Part I) and evaluation of documents (Part II).

2(iii) On 30.09.2021, HPSSC issued a notification declaring final result for 565 posts of Conductors (contract). While issuing final result, HPSSC also declared the waiting panel. Names of the petitioners figured in the waiting panel. Out of total 565 recommended candidates, 47 did not join their duties/pre-service training. A further notification was issued by HPSSC on 11.03.2022 (Annexure P-2) recommending names of next 47 candidates from the waiting panel for appointment to the posts of Conductors. Names of petitioners were not recommended in the list of 47 candidates as they figured below 47 candidates in the waiting panel. 39 out of 47 recommended candidates joined their duties/ pre- service training, 08 candidates did not join.

On 28.05.2022, HPSSC issued a notification recommending the names of next 08 candidates from the waiting panel for appointment as Conductors (contract). Names of petitioners being lower in rank in the waiting list panel were not recommended.

2(iv) In March, 2022 petitioner No.5 sought information from the respondent under the Right to Information Act (RTI) as to: (i) how many candidates had joined pursuant to the recommendations made by HPSSC on 18.11.2021; (ii) how many Conductors out of 565 appointed candidates left the job after joining; and iii) vacancies of Conductors existing as on date.

Vide Annexure P-3 dated 10.03.2022 respondents supplied the information that out of total candidates recommended on 18.11.2021, 47 candidates did not join their duties; 32 candidates left the job after joining and there were total 439 posts of Conductors lying vacant as on date of supply of the information under the RTI Act i.e. on 10.03.2022.

2(v) HPSSC did not resort to filling up 32 vacant posts of Conductors from waiting panel, instead on 08.07.2022 the respondent-Corporation requested HPSSC to initiate fresh process for filling up 360 vacant posts of Conductors including 32 posts which had remained vacant due to non-joining of selected/recommended candidates on contract basis. Accordingly, on 24.09.2022, HPSSC issued an advertisement inviting applications for filling up various posts in different departments including 360 posts of Conductors (contract) in respondent-corporation.

2(vi) At this stage, Laxmi Dutt and others versus H.R.T.C and another, CWP No.7103 of 2022 decided on 03.04.2024 was instituted. Some of the present petitioners were petitioners in Laxmi Dutt (supra). The writ petition was with the prayer for directing the respondent-Corporation to offer appointment to the petitioners against 32 vacant posts of Conductors on the ground that names of petitioners figured in the waiting panel and therefore, vacant posts were required to be filled from t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top