ORDER :

(Subba Reddy Satti, J.)

Heard Sri G.V.S. Kishore Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.S. Manidhar Pingali, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services for respondents 1 to 5.

2. The petitioner, Lab Technician GR-II on contract basis, Area Hospital, Yerragondapalem, Prakasam District filed the above writ petition challenging the show cause notice vide Rc.No.891-2/E6/2024, dated 25.09.2024 (Ex.P.1), issued by the 5th respondent, as illegal and arbitrary.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner was selected and appointed to the post of Lab Technician GR-II on a contract basis in pursuance of notification No.01/2022 dated 06.08.2022 vide Rc.No.1449/E6/2022, dated 11.01.2023. A complaint was made against the petitioner’s apprenticeship training certificate. The 2nd respondent directed an inquiry. The petitioner attended inquiry and filed statement of defense. Pending the same, a show cause notice was issued without furnishing requisite documents.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, per contra, would submit that writ petition filed, impugning the show cause notice, per se is not maintainable.

5. Thus, as seen from Ex.P.1 before