IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
B. KRISHNA MOHAN, J.
G.N. Nagaraju - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary and another - Respondents
Writ Petition No.13062 of 2022
Decided On : 15-12-2022
ORDER :
B. Krishna Mohan, J.
This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent No.2 in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 08.12.2021 in respect of the petitioner’s land popularly known as Mathrusri Tarigonda Vengamamba Brundavanam admeasuring in an extent of Ac.0-12½ cents in Survey No.641 situated at Tirumala Village, Tirupati, Chittoor District for construction of Matrusri Tarigonda Vengamamba Nilayam and Dhyana Mandiram by the petitioner.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned senior counsel Mr. S. Satyanarayana Prasad for the respondent No.2.
3. The petitioner’s representation to the respondent No.2 dated 08.12.2021 is as follows :
(2) From that time to till the present generation, our heirs are performing Tarigonda Vengamamba Mutyala harati Kainkaryam in Ekantaseva in SRivari temple.
(3) My father Late G. Subramanyam has two sons. Myself is the eldest by name G.S. Nagaraju. The second son Mr. Viswa Murthy is performing Tarigonda Mutyala Harathi Kainkaryam in Ekantaseva in Srivari temple. Tirumala.
(4) In Tirumala at Tarigonda Vengamamba Brundavanam (Samadhi) our family descendants evne today performing daily morning and evening litting of the lamp (deeparadhanam), pooja and daily pooja Kainkaryams.
(5) After Vengamamba Amma went into Brundavanam (samadhi) our ancestors had been protecting the surrounding place/site by performing nityapooja and protecting the same.
(6) As per the judgment in O.S.No.211 of 1982 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor district dated 06.10.1989 obtained by my late father G. Subrahmanyam and as per the orders of RDO, Chandragiri, the Tirumala Vengamamba Brundavan in Survey No.642 in an extent of Ac.0-58 cents belongs to Tarigonda Vengamamba. In it as per Survey No.641 Ac.0-12 ½ cents along with Tarigonda Vengamamba Brundavanam, the surrounding site belongs to Vengamamba family members. As per Survey No.592, 643, Ac.0-45 ½ cents was taken over by the TTD from Kuppaiah Sarma for which they said the compensation would be paid to our family members/descendants. But TTD has not so far paid.
(7) Hence the above said officer may consider our request by examining in detail and an appropriate decision may be taken if Tarigonda Vengamamab Brundavanam, the surrounding place/site if it is allotted, we build Tarigonda NIlayam there and still more develop the Brundavanam.
And
(8) We wilfully desire that the TTD gives the permissions to have Dhyana Mandiram and for the coming devotees to cater annadana Prasadam (free food) distribution in Tarigonda Vengamamab Nilayam and for construction of Tarigonda Nilayam in the surrounding places of Brundavanam. We hope and wish that justice would be done to us by following the judgment of the court and the order of the RDO.
Sd/-
G.S. Nagaraja
(Heirs of Mathrusri Tarigonda Vengamamba)
Tirupati
Phone No.9177525712
Address:
Flat No.201, Lakshmi Balaji NIvas,
Viswanath Nagar,
Near Bonthalamma Temple,
Karakambadi Road, Tirupati – 517 507
Copy to
1. …
2. …
3. …
4. …
Enclosures:
1. …
2. …
3. …
4. …
5. …
4. The petitioner along with his brother being the plaintiffs initiated action against the respondent No.2 as defendant in O.S.No.317 of 2014 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati, to declare that the plaintiffs are the legal heirs and the legal representatives of the deceased G. Subrahmanyam and they are entitled to perform Mutyala Harati to Lord Venkateswara at the time of ekanthaseva in Sivari temple, Tirumala and for awarding costs. The said suit was decreed partly only to the extent of declaring the plaintiffs as the legal heirs of the decreased G. Subramanyam vide it’s judgment dated 26.08.2016. For the other reliefs, it was dismissed.
5. In LPA No.77 of 1997 before the Division Bench of the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh, date
The Kerala Land Conservancy Act does not permit summary eviction in the presence of bona fide title disputes, requiring civil adjudication for property rights conflicts.
The court affirmed the established rights of the petitioner to perform religious rites at a disputed site, directing state authorities to ensure protection and prevent contrary actions by rival claim....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.