Back
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Uttaradi Mutt – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka, Rep. by the Principal Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks police protection for conducting established religious rituals. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments and contentions presented regarding religious authority. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court’s observations leading to legal conclusions and past admissions. (Para 16 , 18 , 24) |
| 4. final determination on the rightful authority over the brindavana. (Para 25 , 27) |
| 5. conclusion and directive on who may perform rituals. (Para 28) |
ORDER :
Suraj Govindaraj, J.
1. Shri. Uttaradi Mutt, the petitioner in W.P.No.103982/2023 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs.
b. Consequently, direct the respondent No.4 authority to allow the application
The court affirmed the established rights of the petitioner to perform religious rites at a disputed site, directing state authorities to ensure protection and prevent contrary actions by rival claim....
A suit for declaration of title to property and for permanent injunction is not maintainable without notice under Section 80 of the C.P.C. if the defendants are claiming title to the property.
The court ruled that the Udayasthamana Pooja's status as a religious practice must be established in civil court, and the Managing Committee's decisions regarding rituals are not subject to judicial ....
Constructive res judicata and CPC principles apply to writ petitions, barring new unraised claims like superior priest office; no liberty to withdraw for fresh suit to prevent abuse of process and re....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
