Back
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
ALLAM NAVANEITH SAI ROYAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Smt. Avanija Inuganti, Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Ravi Kiran Kumar Kolusu, Learned Standing Counsel for SAAP.
2. The prayer made in the Writ Petition is as under:
(i) action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing G.O.Ms. No. 10, Ministry of Youth advancement, Tourism & Culture (Sports) Department dated 15.07.2008 and by nit including Sports certificates issued by the 7th Respondent i.e. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) for availing the benefit of admission into educational institutions through Sports Quota.
(ii) action of the 4th Respondent in declaring the Petitioner as ineligible for admission through Sports Quota by issuing/publishing his name at item 31 in the “not eligible list.”
(iii) consequent action of the 5th Respondent herein in publishing “RGUKT UG-Admissions 2023-24- Provisional Selection List under Sports Category” and Tentative Priority List towards admission into 6 years integrated B.Tech program in RGKUT under Sports Quota prepared as per G.O.Ms. No. 10 of YAT & C(
Denial of sports quota admission based on non-recognition of valid sports certificates was held unconstitutional, emphasizing equal treatment under the law for sports distinctions recognized by autho....
The prospectus should be interpreted to preserve the benefit of the candidate, and the substance of the candidate's achievements should be considered, especially in extraordinary circumstances such a....
Mere representation at a National or International level does not guarantee reservation under the J&K Sports Policy. Eligibility for reservation requires outstanding proficiency and participation in ....
The central legal point established is that certificates from an unrecognized association cannot be considered for admission, and the responsibility lies with the association to obtain recognition.
Eligibility for sports quota reservation must adhere to established criteria; rejecting valid sports certificates violates established policies.
The essential qualifications for appointment to a post are for the employer to decide, and the court cannot lay down the conditions of eligibility.
The form prescribed under the rules can never have any effect on the interpretation of the parent statute.
The court established that arbitrary restrictions on eligibility criteria for sports quotas violate constitutional principles of equality and fair classification.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
