SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(J&K) 122

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
RAJESH SEKHRI, J.
Suhaib Sahil – Petitioner
Versus
UT, th. J.&K. Sports Council and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No. 3179 of 2023
Decided On : 07-05-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. B.A. Bashir, with Ms. Falak Bashir.
For the Respondents: Mr. Jehangir Dar, Mr. Syed Musaib, Mr. M. Ashraf Wani.

Mere representation at a National or International level does not guarantee reservation under the J&K Sports Policy. Eligibility for reservation requires outstanding proficiency and participation in National championships, as per the Rules of 2008 and Amended Rules of 2008.

Headnote:

Sports Category - Admission to Ph.D Programme - Government Order No. 808-GAD of 2008 - Rules of 2008 - Amended Rules of 2008

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner applied for admission to Ph.D Programme in Civil Engineering under Sports Category. He was shown at Serial No. 06 in the provisional merit list but was found ineligible for selection under the Sports category due to having single participation at the National level. Petitioner sought mandamus for his admission and challenged the communication and notification issued by the respondent-Sports Council and University.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's single participation at the National level did not meet the eligibility criteria for reservation under the J&K Sports Policy and Rules of 2008. The court upheld the decision of the respondent-Sports Council and the University to deny the petitioner's selection under the sports category.

Issues: Violation of Government Order No. 808-GAD of 2008, eligibility for selection under Sports Category, jurisdiction of the respondent-Sports Council, and interpretation of the J&K Sports Policy.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that mere representation at a National or International level does not automatically entitle a sportsperson to reservation under the J&K Sports Policy. The eligibility criteria require outstanding proficiency and participation in National championships, as per the Rules of 2008 and Amended Rules of 2008.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed as the court found no illegality in the decision of the respondent-Sports Council and the University to deny the petitioner's selection under the sports category.

JUDGMENT :

1. Pursuant to notification No. 02 of 2023 dated 25.05.2023, for admission to Ph.D Programme (Full Time/Part time), issued by the respondent-Islamic University of Science and Technology, Awantipora, petitioner applied for admission in the discipline of Civil Engineering (Full Time) under Sports Category. Provisional merit list of Ph.D Programme for academic session 2022-23 for Civil Engineering came to be issued by the respondent-University, in which, petitioner was shown at Serial No. 06 under the category “Sports”. Since one Aijaz Ahmad Wani, figuring at Serial No. 04 of the said provisional merit list, did not join, sports certificates of the petitioner were sent by respondent No. 06 i.e. Assistant Registrar Academics of the respondent-University for verification to the Secretary J&K Sports Council Srinagar-respondent No.2. However, the Administrative Officer of the respondent-Sports Council, vide its communication No. SC/2407/7270-72 dated 09.10.2023, impugned in the present petition, conveyed the respondent-University that petitioner, having single participation at the National level, is not eligible for selection under the Sports Category. Consequently, respondent No.7 came to be provisionally selected in the Open Merit Category by the respondent-University vide impugned notification No. 05 of 2022-23 (Ph.D Programme) dated 30.10.2023.

2. Petitioner has invoked writ jurisdiction of this Court, in terms of Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for quashment of aforesaid communication dated 09.10.2023 issued by respondent-Sports Council, by virtue of which, he was found ineligible for selection under the Sports category as also notification dated 30.10.2023 issued by respondent-University whereby private respondent No. 7 has been selected for the discipline in the Open Merit Category. Petitioner, consequently, seeks mandamus to the respondent-University for his admission to the Ph.D programme in Civil Engineering under the Sports category.

3. Petitioner has assailed impugned communication dated 09.10.2023 issued by respondent-Sports Council primarily on the ground that it is in flagrant violation of the Government Order No. 808-GAD of 2008 dated 17.06.2008. According to the petitioner, he is eligible for consideration for selection under the Sports category, on the basis of certificate issued by the sports Council, in terms of Rule 3 of J&K Certification of Outstanding Proficiency in Sports Rules 2008.

4. Petitioner has also questioned the impugned communication of Sports Council on the ground that since his sports certificates were sent to the Sports Council for verification only, therefore, it could not go beyond verification and declare him ineligible for selection.

5. It is also contention of the petitioner that since the notification of the respondent-University only asked for a certificate under Sports category and not for certificates of participation of Sportspersons in two National events, therefore, petitioner, having complied with the said condition, is entitled to admission in the respondent-University under the Sports Category.

6. Per contra, the respondent-Sports council is affront with the contention that no legal, constitutional or fundamental right of the petitioner has been violated so as to clothe him to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court. According to the respondent-Sports Council, two sports certificates of the petitioner in the discipline of Ball Badminton with respect to (i) participation in North Zone Ball Badminton Championship held at Amballa from 13th to 15th April, 2023 and (ii) participation in First Youth National Badminton Championship held at Bihar from 25th to 27th March, 2023, were examined on the analogy of criteria laid down in Government Order No. 808-GAD of 2008 dated 17.06.2008, as amended vide Government Order No. 946-GAD of 2008 dated 15.07.2008 and petitioner having single participation at the National level, was found not eligible for selection. Accordi

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top