Back
V. SUJATHA
Udaya Bhanu Associates, Rep. By its Managing Partner – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Registration And Stamps) Department – Respondent
ORDER :
V. Sujatha, J.
As the issue involved in all these cases is one and the same, with consent of all, these writ petitions are decided by this common order.
i) W.P. No.41920 of 2015 :
The writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
ii) W.P. No.41921 of 2015:
The writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
iii) W.P. No.41922 of 2015:
The writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following
A registered Agreement of Sale-cum-GPA cannot be unilaterally cancelled.
A writ petition is not maintainable to challenge the registration of a cancellation deed executed unilaterally by the settlor of a settlement deed. The proper remedy for the aggrieved party is to fil....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Registering Authority has no power to unilaterally cancel a settlement deed, and such unilateral cancellation is void and non-est in law.
A General Power of Attorney can be revoked unless coupled with interest, and unilateral cancellation by the principal is permissible if the agency lacks such interest.
Unilateral cancellation of the Development Agreement-cum-GPA by one party to the detriment of another party is not permissible under the Indian Contract Act.
A sale of immovable property is incomplete without registration, making an unregistered sale deed invalid, particularly when a power of attorney is cancelled.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
