SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1480

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
A.V. RAVINDRA BABU, J.
Anakapalli Pothuraju, S/o. Kondayya – Appellant
Versus
The State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.1705 Of 2009
Decided On : 10-10-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri Muthyala Sobhanadri Naidu, Legal Aid Counsel.
For the Respondent: Sri N. Sravan Kumar, Learned Special Asst. Rep. Learned Public Prosecutor.

The plea of insanity requires substantial proof to demonstrate that the accused was incapable of knowing the nature of the act or its wrongfulness at the time of the offence.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 304 (Part-II), and 307 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 207 and 209 - Conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and causing grievous hurt - Evidence of multiple eyewitnesses established accused's deliberate act of stabbing - Court affirmed the trial court’s findings that despite the plea of insanity, the defence was adequately disproven by the prosecution - Evidence corroborated by medical reports confirming injuries caused by the accused - Judgement upheld. (Paras 11, 12, 62)

(B) Insanity Defence - Requirements to substantiate plea - The accused failed to demonstrate that he was incapable of understanding the nature of his actions at the time of the offence according to Section 84 IPC - The plea of insanity must be proved with adequate medical and circumstantial evidence. (Paras 49, 53, 62)

Facts of the case:
Accused stabbed the deceased and his wife during a domestic dispute on 09.01.2008, leading to the death of the deceased from his injuries, while the wife sustained serious injuries requiring medical treatment.

Findings of Court:
Prosecution met burden of proof, convincing court of the accused’s guilt under Section 304 (Part-II) for causing death and Section 326 for causing grievous injuries, affirming the trial judge's decision.

Issues: 1) Did the prosecution prove the accused caused the death of the deceased and injuries to the wife? 2) Was the trial court's judgment sustainable under law?

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed the earlier judgement that the act of the accused was premeditated and not influenced by any mental disorder at the time of the attack, dismissing the insanity plea.

Result: Criminal Appeal dismissed, upholding conviction and sentence.

Table of Content
1. case details including parties involved and nature of offence. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. analysis of evidence leading to conviction. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
3. discussion on the defense arguments regarding mental health. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. final ruling and confirmation of prior decisions. (Para 63)

JUDGMENT :

(A.V. Ravindra Babu, J.)

The judgment, dated 18.11.2009, in Sessions Case No.64 of 2009 on the file of the Court of VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Visakhapatnam (for short, ‘the learned Additional Sessions Judge’), is under challenge in the present Criminal Appeal filed by the appellant, who was the unsuccessful accused in the aforesaid Sessions Case.

2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the trial court, for the sake of convenience.

3. Sessions Case No.296 of 2006 arose out of the committal order in Preliminary Registration Case (PRC) No.2 of 2008 on the file of the Court of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Anakapalli (for short, ‘the learned Magistrate’) pertaining to Crime No.3 of 2008 of Munagapaka Police Station, Visakhapatnam District for the offences under Sections 302 and 307 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (for short, ‘the IPC’).

4. The State, represented by the Inspector of Police, Anakapalli Circle, filed charge sheet alleging the aforesaid offences. The case of the prosecution, briefly, according to the contents of the charge sheet, is as follows:

(i) Accused and Dokka Samudram (hereinafter referred to as ‘the deceased’) are the residents of Ambedkar Colony, Munagapaka Village. They have been doing business in the animals and skins and they had grudges since long time. On 09.01.2008, at about 12:30 p.m., the accused picked up a quarrel with his wife and beat her black and blue and his wife complained the same to Yellabilli Gowresu (LW.4) and others. On seeing the misbehavior of the accused, the deceased and his wife Dokka Simha Laxmi (LW.2) intervened and tried to chastise the accused. Then, the accused revolted against the deceased and his wife and threatened them with dire consequences. The accused also caught hold of the tuft of LW.2, dragged her and banged her with hands. Then, her husband intervened and tried to rescue her. Then, the accused picked up a pen knife from his waist and stabbed the deceased on his stomach and also stabbed LW.2 and even made an attempt to kill her. Then, Dokka Bhogeswara Rao (LW.1), Yelaka Nookaraju (LW.3), LW.4, Dokka Krishna Veni (LW.5), Tambarica Samba Siva (LW.6), Dokka Modakondamma (LW.7), Vuppati Pydikonda (LW.8), Anakapalli Lakshmi (LW.9) witnessed the incident and immediately called 108 Ambulance and shifted both the injured to Area Hospital, Anakapalli and on their advice, they shifted them to King George Hospital (KGH), Visakhapatnam and on their way deceased died near Anakapalli.

(ii) LW.1, son of the deceased, lodged a complaint at Munagapaka Police Station on the same day at about 03:30 p.m. to the SI of Police, Munagapaka. The Head Constable of Munagapaka Police Station registered the report as a case in Crime No.3 of 2008 for the offences under Sections 302 and 307 IPC, visited and examined the scene of offence in the presence of mediators and prepared a rough sketch of the scene of offence and took the photos of the scene of offence.

(iii) The In-charge Circle Inspector of Anakapalli took up investigation, held inquest over the dead body on the next day in the presence of panchayatdars and examined the witnesses, sent the dead body to NTR Government Hospital, Anakapalli for autopsy. He examined the witnesses, recorded their statements, arrested the accused on 10.01.2008 at 06:00 p.m. at the bye-pass road junction and recorded the confessional statement of the accused in the presence of mediators and in pursuance of the confession statement, recovered the blood stained pen knife at 09:20 p.m. on 10.11.2008 under a cover of mediators report and sent the accu

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top