SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1615

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A.V.Ravindra Babu, J.
Pelamala Neela Kantam – Petitioner
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.951 of 2009
Decided On : 20-10-2023

The prosecution must prove culpable homicide beyond reasonable doubt, distinguishing between intent to kill and knowledge of likely fatal outcomes.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 304 (Part II) - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 235(2) - Appellant convicted for culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Charge under Section 302 IPC not established - Evidence corroborated by multiple witnesses and medical reports indicating fatal injuries caused by the accused - Error in severity of sentence addressed; reduced from 10 years to 7 years imprisonment. (Paras 10, 36)

Facts of the case:
The appellant attacked and fatally injured the deceased after being denied money for alcohol, resulting in the deceased's death due to massive hemorrhage caused by lacerated wounds. (Paras 2, 5, 34)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the conviction under Section 304 (Part II) IPC, noting the lack of intent to kill while acknowledging knowledge of likely fatal consequences. The initial severe sentence was altered considering the appellant's age and the nature of the crime. (Paras 36, 38)

Issues: 1) Did the prosecution prove that the accused attacked the deceased causing his death? 2) Is the conviction under Section 304 (Part II) IPC sustainable? (Paras 13)

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that the prosecution presented sufficient evidence to support a conviction under Section 304 (Part II) IPC given the circumstances surrounding the incident, reaffirming the principle that intent to kill can differ from knowledge of likely fatal consequences. (Paras 34, 35)

Result: Appeal allowed in part; sentence modified to 7 years imprisonment.

Table of Content
1. the backdrop of the case including initial charges and grounds for appeal. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background of the case (Para 5 , 10)
3. evidence presented and arguments from both sides. (Para 12 , 16)
4. defense and prosecution arguments (Para 14 , 15)
5. analysis of witness credibility and evidence. (Para 28 , 30 , 32)
6. court's observations on evidence (Para 33 , 34)
7. determination of culpability and sentence (Para 35)
8. final findings relating to the conviction and sentences. (Para 36)
9. conclusion of the appeal (Para 38 , 39)

JUDGMENT :

A.V.Ravindra Babu, J.

The judgment, dated 30.06.2009, in Sessions Case No.31 of 2009 on the file of the Court of VII Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Visakhapatnam (for short, ‘the learned Additional Sessions Judge'), is under challenge in the present Criminal Appeal filed by the appellant, who is the unsuccessful accused.

2. The appellant herein (accused) faced charge under Section 302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (for short, ‘the IPC') pertaining to Crime No.25 of 2008 of Dumbriguda Police Station, Visakhapatnam. The learned Additional Sessions Judge found the accused guilty of the offence under Section 304 (Part-II) IPC, as against the original charge under Section 302 IPC, convicted him under Section 235(2) Cr.P.C and sentenced him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 1 month.

3. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the trial Court, for the sake of convenience.

4. Sessions Case No.31 of 2009 arose out of the committal order in Preliminary Registration Case (PRC) No.4 of 2009 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Araku Valley Chinthapalli (for short, ‘the learned Magistrate') pertaining to Crime No.25 of 2008 of Dumbriguda Police Station, Visakhapatnam for the offence under Section 302 of IPC.

5. The case of the prosecution, in brief, according to the contents of the charge sheet, as above, is that on 11.07.2008 morning Pujari Bassu (hereinafter referred to as ‘the deceased'), son of Jalandar (late), went to Araku Santha (weekly shandy) along with LW.1-Pujari Lavakusa, his son, for purchasing essential commodities. After completion of their work, LW.1 and LW.5-Chattu Appala Raju along with the deceased stood at an auto stand, nearby Araku approach mud road at Girijan Co-operative Corporation (GCC) godown. At 12:00 noon, accused came to the deceased and asked him to give money for consumption of alcohol. The deceased refused to give money for his consumption of alcohol. Due to which, the accused grew wild, took a long stick, broken it and beat the deceased indiscriminately on his right neck, head, throat and mouth with an intention to kill him on account of which, the deceased collapsed with bleeding injuries. On seeing the incident, LW.1 raised cries. On hearing the cries of LW.1, LWs.5 to LW.10 viz., Chattu Appala Raju, Poli Raju, Shavukari Trinadh Rao, Kotiyada Sanyasamma, Rapaka Pothayya and Poddu Bota Dev rushed to the spot and witnessed the occurrence. LWs.1 to LW.5 viz., Pujari Lavakusa, Pujari Gummanna, Pujari Damodar, Pujari Manaka and Chattu Appala Raju shifted the deceased to Community Health Center (CHC), Araku Valley and on the way, the deceased succumbed to injuries.

On 11.07.2008 at 07:00 P.M., on the basis of the report given by LW.1, LW.20-M. Eliea Babu, Inspector of Police registered the FIR in Crime No.25 of 2008 for the offence under Section 302 IPC and took up investigation. During further investigation, he visited the scene of offence on 12.07.2008 at 06:00 A.M., examined the scene of offence, prepared scene observation report and seized the stick and soil with blood stains and control earth under the cover of observation report, attested by LW.13 and LW.14 viz., G. Devaraj and Mukkai Satyanarayana. He prepared rough sketch of the scene of offence and got photographed the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top