IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
V.Sujatha, J.
Sahaya Institute of Advanced Studies In Education - Petitioner
Versus
The State of AP and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 7177 of 2024
Decided On : 20-03-2024
(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - National Council for Teachers Education Act, 1993 - Sections 14 and 16 - Writ petition seeking affiliation for academic year 2023-24 - Petitioner institution, recognized by NCTE, denied affiliation by University due to lack of government notification - Court held that University must grant affiliation following NCTE recognition without waiting for government approval. (Paras 7, 8, 14, 15)
(B) Powers of University - The University, as an autonomous body, is responsible for granting affiliation to institutions recognized by NCTE, independent of government notifications. (Paras 12, 14)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner institution, a B.Ed College, sought affiliation after shifting from Chittoor to Guntur District, having received NCTE recognition. Despite applying and paying fees, the University denied affiliation citing lack of government notification.
Findings of Court:
The Court directed the University to grant affiliation to the petitioner institution, emphasizing the autonomy of the University in this matter.
Issues: The main issue was whether government notification is necessary for the University to grant affiliation to recognized institutions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the University must grant affiliation based on NCTE recognition without waiting for government approval, affirming the autonomy of the University.
Result: Writ Petition allowed.
ORDER :
V.Sujatha, J.
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
2. Heard Mr. Mathukumilli Sri. Vijay, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Higher Education appearing for the respondent No.1, Ms. S.Parineetha, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and Mr. M.Murali Lincon, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents No.3 to 5.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the B.Ed College offering various courses for the past many decades. The petitioner institution got recognition from the National Council for Teacher Education and is running as per the regulations framed by the NCTE and the provisions of AP Universities Act without any deviations.
4. Initially the recognition was granted at Chittoor District, which falls under 'Sri. Venkateswara University, Tirupati'. Thereafter the petitioner institution could not run the same at Chitoor District and subsequently applied for shifting permission before the National Council for Teacher Education from Chittoor District to Guntur District, which falls under jurisdiction of the 5th respondent University. The NCTE, granted shifting permission vide orders dated 23.01.2024.
5. While so, on 24.01.2024 the petitioner institution approached the 5th respondent and requested to grant affiliation. But the University authorities informed that the petitioner institution is not notified by the 1st respondent and without such notification the University cannot grant affiliation.
6. The grievance of the petitioner is that the provisions of NCTE Act clearly mandates that the respondent University being an examining body, should grant affiliation as and when the NCTE grants recognition to any institution as per Section 16 of the NCTE Act. Despite the same, the petitioner approached the 1st respondent vide representation dated 29.01.2024, requesting the authorities to grant statutory permissions as insisted by the 5th respondent. The 1st respondent vide letter dated 01.03.2024, addressed the 2nd respondent and called for specific remarks with respect to the petitioner institution. The 2nd respondent submitted its remarks to the 1st respondent on 07.03.2024 recommending the case of the petitioner institution for issuance of Government Order enabling the 5th respondent University to grant affiliation. But the same is pending before the 1st respondent and no action is taken till date. Hence, the writ petition.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied on Section 16 of the NCTE Act, which is extracted herein under:
Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no examining body shall, on or after the appointed day, --
(a) grant affiliation, whether provisional or otherwise, to any institution; or
(b) hold examination, whether provisional or otherwise, for a course or training conducted by a recognised institution,
unless the institution concerned has obtained recognition from the Regional Committee concerned, under Section 14 or permission for a course
The University must grant affiliation to recognized institutions without requiring government notification, affirming its autonomy under the NCTE Act.
The purpose of “recognition” and “affiliation” is different. In the context of the N.C.T.E. Act, “affiliation” enables and permits an institution to send its students to participate in the public exa....
Point of Law : State actions are required to be non-arbitrary and justified on the touchstone of Article 14 of the Constitution. Action of the State or its instrumentality must be in conformity with ....
The court affirmed that educational institutions must comply with regulatory standards, and the authority to keep affiliations in abeyance is inherent, provided due process is followed.
Administrative inaction on affiliation application post-NCTE recognition violates Article 14; must decide within reasonable time.
The requirement for a State NOC for university affiliation contravenes NCTE Regulations and central legislation, as state laws cannot impose conditions inconsistent with national standards.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.