SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1622

V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Chinta Srinivasa Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Mangena Sree Rama Rao – Respondent


ORDER :

(V.R.K. Krupa Sagar, J.)

Sole defendant in the suit filed this Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 29.03.2019 of learned III Additional District Judge, Bhimavaram in I.A.No.486 of 2019 in O.S.No.88 of 2015. By the impugned order, the learned trial Court dismissed the application of the sole defendant for his prayer to implead eight individuals as defendants in the suit.

2. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.88 of 2015.

3. Counter affidavit is filed by respondents resisting the petition.

4. Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, the learned counsel for petitioner and Sri K.K.Durga Prasad, the learned counsel for respondents submitted arguments.

5. The point that falls for consideration is:

    "Whether the proposed parties are necessary or proper parties for their impleadment as defendants in O.S.No.88 of 2015 and the learned trial Court failed to exercise jurisdiction vested with it and the impugned order occasioned injustice requiring interference?"

POINT:

6. O.S.No.88 of 2015 was filed by plaintiffs as against defendant seeking for refund of Rs.23,45,520/- along with 24% interest per annum and for costs and such other

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top